The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 7%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (7 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $20.
Starwood Property Trust, Inc. STWD
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
read at $15.98
Starwood Property Trust, Inc. holds its Distribution at $15.98.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 217 days |
| Price | $15.98 |
| Valuation | 16.82 trailing · 8.37 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.03 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 21.80% |
| Profit margin | 60.46% |
| Debt to equity | 315.95 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 8 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: mortgage. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: mortgage Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Mortgage REITs trip over their own rules
Picture a lender doling out cash for office towers and homes across borders, only for the gatekeeper to wave the whole trade away on day one. Starwood Property Trust shows solid revenue growth at 22 percent and a fat 60 percent profit margin, yet the ethical screen blocks it outright because mortgage lending sits on the prohibited list. That single fail overrides the 8.9 times forward earnings and the gap between the $17 share price and our $24 fair value.
We pass for the same reason the screen exists. The business clears none of the basic ethical hurdles that keep us out of certain sectors, regardless of how cheap the numbers appear or what the eight analysts say with their $20 median target. Low 5 percent ROE and an unknown moat only reinforce the decision to stay away.
Real estate cycles can flatten earnings fast, and mortgage exposure adds layers of interest-rate and credit risk that cheap multiples often mask. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 8.4x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 16.8x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 21.8% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | 60.5% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 5.3% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 3.16 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 12.86 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.03 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $6.1B |
| Employees | 324 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in STWD's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
STWD trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $17.23 | -1.0% | · | $990 | -1.0% |
| 2 months | $17.68 | -3.5% | · | $965 | -3.5% |
| 3 months | $17.16 | -0.6% | $0.48 | $1,022 | +2.2% |
| 6 months | $17.51 | -2.6% | $0.96 | $1,029 | +2.9% |
| 1 year | $18.41 | -7.3% | $1.92 | $1,031 | +3.1% |
| 2 years | $15.53 | +9.8% | $3.84 | $1,346 | +34.6% |
| 3 years | $14.10 | +21.0% | $5.76 | $1,619 | +61.9% |
| 5 years | $16.68 | +2.3% | $9.60 | $1,598 | +59.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.