The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (7 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $92.
Selective Insurance Group, Inc. SIGI
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Selective Insurance Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides insurance products and services in the United States.
read at $94.79
Selective Insurance Group, Inc. holds its Markup at $94.79.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 24 days |
| Price | $94.79 |
| Valuation | 11.76 trailing · 10.76 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 0.29 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 4.50% |
| Profit margin | 9.10% |
| Debt to equity | 24.60 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 7 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: insurance. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: insurance Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Ethics draw the line before any insurance claim
When a small business owner files after a fire or a driver needs cover after a crash, the payout flows through property and casualty insurers like Selective. The numbers on paper look steady enough, with revenue up 6 percent, an 8 percent profit margin and 13 percent return on equity, yet none of that matters once the sector itself fails the ethical screen outright.
We pass for that single reason. The stock sits at 10.9 times forward earnings with a modest premium to the analyst median target, but the ethical verdict overrides any valuation debate and leaves the opportunity rating at none.
Currency and rate cycles can still swing results sharply in this business, yet the screen is the binding constraint here. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 10.8x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 11.8x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 4.5% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 9.1% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 14.2% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.25 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 0.32 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.29 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $5.6B |
| Employees | 2,800 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in SIGI's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
SIGI trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $84.39 | +8.2% | $0.43 | $1,087 | +8.7% |
| 2 months | $79.54 | +14.8% | $0.43 | $1,154 | +15.4% |
| 3 months | $76.19 | +19.9% | $0.43 | $1,205 | +20.5% |
| 6 months | $80.40 | +13.6% | $0.86 | $1,147 | +14.7% |
| 1 year | $83.54 | +9.3% | $1.67 | $1,113 | +11.3% |
| 2 years | $90.90 | +0.5% | $3.16 | $1,040 | +4.0% |
| 3 years | $94.94 | -3.8% | $4.51 | $1,010 | +1.0% |
| 5 years | $71.39 | +27.9% | $6.78 | $1,374 | +37.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.