The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 3.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $68.
Realty Income O
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Realty Income Corporation, an S&P 500 company, is real estate partner to the world's leading companies.
read at $62.70
Realty Income holds its Distribution at $62.70.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 1 days |
| Price | $62.70 |
| Valuation | 51.39 trailing · 36.73 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.72 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $47.41 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 12.00% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 12.00% |
| Profit margin | 18.90% |
| Debt to equity | 73.47 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 20 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 40.3% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 1.1% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 2.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Premium Retail REITs With Heavy Debt Loads
Picture a landlord with fifteen thousand retail sites across America, collecting rent from big brands every month. Realty Income looks like a reliable income machine on the surface, yet our fair value sits at 47.58 against the current 65.71 price. The narrow moat, 3 percent return on equity and 38.7 times forward earnings give us no reason to step in.
Revenue growth of 12 percent and a 19 percent profit margin sound steady, yet the business fails our ethical screen on its debt ratio. Analysts may cluster around a 68 target and a buy rating, but that does not change the fact that the shares trade at a 28 percent premium to what the numbers support.
Cyclical retail exposure adds another layer of risk if consumer spending slows. We pass. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 36.7x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 51.4x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 12.0% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 18.9% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 2.8% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.73 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 2.06 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.72 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $58.5B |
| Employees | 544 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on O
- › The Portfolio That Lets You Cruise Through the News, Unbothered 24/7 Wall St. · 29d ago
- › Here’s the Funding It Takes to Keep Learning Forever 24/7 Wall St. · 29d ago
- › Create Your Own “Bad Luck Fund” For Life’s Inevitable Setbacks 24/7 Wall St. · 29d ago
- › 3 Beaten-Down Stocks Built for Long-Term Passive Income Motley Fool · 29d ago
- › Realty Income Eyes Growth via Partnerships: Should You Buy or Hold? Zacks · 30d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in O's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
O trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-02 | BUSHORE MICHELLE | General Counsel | 7,400 | $461,908 | |
| 2026-02-26 | BUSHORE MICHELLE | General Counsel | 7,698 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | ABRAHAM NEIL M | Officer | 41,360 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | REDINGTON NEALE W | Officer | 10,753 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | HAGAN MARK E. | Chief Investment Officer | 40,727 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | BUSHORE MICHELLE | General Counsel | 31,866 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | KEHLE SHANNON | Officer | 7,128 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | PONG JONATHAN CFA | Chief Financial Officer | 7,110 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | ROY SUMIT | Chief Executive Officer | 137,639 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | WHYTE GREGORY J | Chief Operating Officer | 29,630 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 May2024 | Tommy Tuberville | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 9 May2024 | Tommy Tuberville | Republican | buy | 50K–100K |
| 9 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 9 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 9 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $62.09 | +0.3% | $0.27 | $1,008 | +0.8% |
| 2 months | $63.20 | -1.4% | $0.54 | $994 | -0.6% |
| 3 months | $64.18 | -2.9% | $0.81 | $983 | -1.7% |
| 6 months | $55.73 | +11.8% | $1.62 | $1,147 | +14.7% |
| 1 year | $54.32 | +14.7% | $3.24 | $1,207 | +20.7% |
| 2 years | $47.22 | +31.9% | $6.42 | $1,455 | +45.5% |
| 3 years | $51.55 | +20.9% | $9.51 | $1,393 | +39.3% |
| 5 years | $52.82 | +18.0% | $15.39 | $1,471 | +47.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.