The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 12.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $68.
Realty Income
O · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $52.6B · 544 employees
Realty Income Corporation, an S&P 500 company, is real estate partner to the world's leading companies.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-25 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 11 days ago
Screened 2026-09-25 · the tape above runs as of 19:04 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 55.54 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 46.17, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Realty Income holds its Markdown at $55.54. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 1 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 1 days |
| Price at the screen | $55.54 |
| Valuation | 40.54 trailing · 35.76 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.71 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 40.31% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 40.3% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 1.10% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 1.1% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 2.04% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 2.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Realty Income's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 40% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-04. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades above our $46.17 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 9.60% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-25 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 16.9% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 20 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +22% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-25 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsPremium Retail REITs With Heavy Debt Loads
Picture a landlord with fifteen thousand retail sites across America, collecting rent from big brands every month. Realty Income looks like a reliable income machine on the surface, yet our fair value sits at 47.58 against the current 65.71 price. The narrow moat, 3 percent return on equity and 38.7 times forward earnings give us no reason to step in.
Revenue growth of 12 percent and a 19 percent profit margin sound steady, yet the business fails our ethical screen on its debt ratio. Analysts may cluster around a 68 target and a buy rating, but that does not change the fact that the shares trade at a 28 percent premium to what the numbers support.
Cyclical retail exposure adds another layer of risk if consumer spending slows. We pass. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 35.8xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 40.5xexpensive: the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| EPS, trailing | 1.37 |
| EPS, forward | 1.55 |
| Revenue growth | +9.6%steady growth |
| Profit margin | 20.9%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 3.2%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 3.01% |
| Dividend yield | 522.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.75moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 1.53healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.71steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.05% |
| 52-week range | 55.07 - 67.94 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $52.6B |
| Employees | 544 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeO trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 3.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 5% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 15%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- How Large Does Your Portfolio Need to Be to Generate $15,500 a Month? 24/7 Wall St. · 16d ago
- How Much Do You Need Invested to Cover a $2,150 Mortgage Payment With Dividends Alone? 24/7 Wall St. · 16d ago
- High-Yield Dividend Stocks Throw Off Serious Income. Where You Hold Them Matters 24/7 Wall St. · 17d ago
- 3 Unstoppable Dividend Stocks to Buy Now (1 Yields 5.5%) Motley Fool · 18d ago
- This Montly Dividend Stock’s 136th Dividend Hike Highlights its Long-Term Income Track Record Insider Monkey · 18d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-02 | BUSHORE MICHELLE | General Counsel | 7,400 | $461,908 | |
| 2026-02-26 | BUSHORE MICHELLE | General Counsel | 7,698 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | ABRAHAM NEIL M | Officer | 41,360 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | REDINGTON NEALE W | Officer | 10,753 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | HAGAN MARK E. | Chief Investment Officer | 40,727 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | BUSHORE MICHELLE | General Counsel | 31,866 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | KEHLE SHANNON | Officer | 7,128 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | PONG JONATHAN CFA | Chief Financial Officer | 7,110 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | ROY SUMIT | Chief Executive Officer | 137,639 | · | |
| 2026-02-17 | WHYTE GREGORY J | Chief Operating Officer | 29,630 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-23 | Don Beyer | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-23 | Don Beyer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-23 | Don Beyer | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-23 | Don Beyer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-09-22 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $62.09 | +0.3% | $0.27 | $1,008 | +0.8% |
| 2 months | $63.20 | -1.4% | $0.54 | $994 | -0.6% |
| 3 months | $64.18 | -2.9% | $0.81 | $983 | -1.7% |
| 6 months | $55.73 | +11.8% | $1.62 | $1,147 | +14.7% |
| 1 year | $54.32 | +14.7% | $3.24 | $1,207 | +20.7% |
| 2 years | $47.22 | +31.9% | $6.42 | $1,455 | +45.5% |
| 3 years | $51.55 | +20.9% | $9.51 | $1,393 | +39.3% |
| 5 years | $52.82 | +18.0% | $15.39 | $1,471 | +47.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever O does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.