Framework Journal · one stock, one dated entry

Recorded 2026-08-05 · Permanent

An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.

In plain words · Entergy Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production and retail distribution of electricity in the United States.

The label
Distribution

read at $106.86

Entergy holds its Distribution at $106.86.

PHINPOOPSC
  • PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
  • INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
  • POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
  • OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
  • SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
  • edge confirmed
  • edge broken
  • edge forming

Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.

The investor read · the season, not the day

As held on the ledger · 2026-08-05
PhaseDistribution · caution
Quantitative stateThe statistical read favours the sellers, held for 1 days
Price$106.86
Valuation27.33 trailing · 20.97 forward price to earnings
Values screenFAIL · score 10.0
Beta0.49

The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth

Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $101.22 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat, 5.90% revenue growth.

Read at
$106.86
27.33 P/E · 20.97 fwd
Our fair value
$101.22
5% premium
Analyst target (avg)
$126.00
+18% to current
Target low $91.00Analyst target rangeTarget high $139.00
▲ current $106.86 · | average target

Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going

$146$92$38TODAY5y agoPROJECTIONAnalyst high$139.00 +25%Analyst avg$126.00 +14%Our fair value$101.22 -9%Conservative$81.90 -26%

The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street

Current
$106.86
you are here
Conservative
$81.90
-23%
Analyst avg
$126.00
+18%
Our fair value
$101.22
-5%
Analyst high
$139.00
+30%

Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.

Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.

Revenue growth5.90%
Profit margin13.33%
Debt to equity186.77
Analyst consensusBuy · 21 covering

Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.

The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English

This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:

The common standard · AAOIFI
Used by most halal investing apps
✗ DOES NOT PASS
Our stricter standard · asset-based
The one Titan applies
✗ DOES NOT PASS

Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.

What these two standards are, and how they differ →

  • Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
  • Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 43.0% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
  • Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 8.8% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
  • Receivables Money owed to the company is 3.7% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
  • Revenue purity Only 2.5% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass

Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.

The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean

Power bills keep coming but debt does not

Every month households in Arkansas and Louisiana flick the switch and the power flows, yet Entergy carries a debt load that trips our ethical screen outright. At 22.3 times forward earnings the shares trade well above our fair value of 101 dollars while the current price sits at 113, leaving investors with negative margin of safety and no margin for error.

Revenue growth of 12 percent and a 13 percent profit margin look respectable on paper, and the moderate moat in regulated power delivery is real enough. Still, return on equity of just 11 percent does not justify the premium, and the debt ratio failure removes any case for ownership regardless of analyst targets sitting higher at 126.

Cyclical rate pressure and rising interest costs could squeeze those margins further, turning a seemingly defensive utility into a balance sheet headache. Analysis, not advice.

The fundamentals · plain-English read
Forward P/E21.0x
expensive even after accounting for its growth
Trailing P/E27.3x
a premium valuation
Revenue growth5.9%
slow but positive growth
Profit margin13.3%
thin but positive margins
Return on equity10.2%
a modest return on shareholder capital
Debt to equity1.87
a meaningful debt load worth watching
Current ratio0.91
below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets
Beta0.49
barely tracks the market's swings
Market cap$49.9B
Employees12,000

The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.

Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.

Latest news · what the market is reading on ETR

Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.

Related securities · others in ETR's space worth a look

Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.

Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are

ETR trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.

The trader read · the latest dated commentary

The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 2.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 38%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $123. Entered 2026-07-28 · Distribution

The dated journal · newest first, never edited

2026-07-28 Distribution $113.76 +2.7% Entry 4

The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 2.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 38%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $123.

2026-07-18 Distribution $110.74 +0.0% Entry 3

The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 38%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (21 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $123.

2026-07-03 Distribution $110.74 +0.0% Entry 2

The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.

2026-07-02 Distribution $110.74 Entry 1

The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.

Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.

The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed

Most recent filings · ETR
DateInsiderTitleTypeSharesValue
2026-03-02 VIAMONTES ELIECER Officer 80 ·
2026-03-02 FREDERICKSON PHILIP L Director 217 ·
2026-03-02 PUCKETT KAREN ANN Director 217 ·
2026-03-02 LEVENICK STUART L Director 217 ·
2026-03-02 HYLAND MARY ELISE Director 217 ·
2026-03-02 ADAMS GINA F Director 217 ·
2026-03-02 ROPP RALPH LEWIS Director 217 ·
2026-03-02 CALDWELL JAMES FRANK JR Director 217 ·
2026-03-02 BLACK JOHN H Director 217 ·
2026-03-02 ELLIS BRIAN W Director 217 ·

Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.

The political ledger · congressional disclosures

Disclosures naming ETR
DatePoliticianPartyTypeAmount
24 Jul2026 David Taylor Republican sell 1K–15K
24 Jul2026 David Taylor Republican sell 1K–15K
21 Apr2026 Scott Peters Democrat buy 250K–500K
2 Jun2026 John Curtis Republican sell 1K–15K
13 Jul2026 Rick Scott Republican sell 100K–250K

What holding actually paid · price plus dividends

If $1,000 had been placed · historical, not a promise
PeriodPrice thenPrice returnDivs per share$1,000 becameTotal return
1 month $112.97 -1.8% · $982 -1.8%
2 months $115.84 -4.2% $0.64 $964 -3.6%
3 months $103.95 +6.8% $0.64 $1,074 +7.4%
6 months $92.21 +20.4% $1.28 $1,217 +21.7%
1 year $80.16 +38.5% $2.52 $1,416 +41.6%
2 years $51.01 +117.6% $4.89 $2,271 +127.1%
3 years $45.78 +142.4% $7.12 $2,580 +158.0%
5 years $45.60 +143.4% $11.22 $2,680 +168.0%

Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever ETR does next, these words stay.

Entergy · ETR · Distribution · $106.86
Recorded 2026-08-05 · before the outcome · scored mechanically

Get our weekly market brief free.