The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 6.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $68.
Dominion Energy D
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Dominion Energy, Inc.
read at $68.27
Dominion Energy holds its Markdown at $68.27.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markdown label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 16 days |
| Price | $68.27 |
| Valuation | 23.79 trailing · 17.89 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.63 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $63.86 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 17.60% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | 17.60% |
| Profit margin | 13.98% |
| Debt to equity | 160.46 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 12 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 42.2% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 8.4% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 2.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Utility shares priced beyond their steady worth
Paying a power bill feels routine and reliable, yet Dominion Energy trades at a clear premium to what the numbers support. The shares sit 11 percent above our fair value with an 18.6 times forward multiple, while a narrow moat and modest 10 percent return on equity do not justify the stretch.
We pass for straightforward reasons. Revenue growth looks solid at 23 percent but the valuation leaves little margin, the consensus target sits below the current price, and the stock fails our ethical screen on its debt ratio. Regulated utilities can offer stability, yet none of that offsets the gap here.
High leverage adds real exposure if rates stay elevated or if allowed returns come under pressure from regulators. The narrow moat offers little protection against those shifts. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 17.9x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 23.8x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 17.6% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 14.0% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 8.3% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.60 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.81 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.63 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $60.0B |
| Employees | 15,200 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on D
- › NextEra Energy Plans to Spend $59 Billion in Annual Capex Through 2032. Will This Massive Capital Outlay Pay Dividends for Shareholders? Motley Fool · 29d ago
- › NextEra Energy (NEE) Files For Dominion Merger With $2.25 Billion In Bill Credits Simply Wall St. · 16 Jul 2026
- › NextEra, Dominion seek regulatory approval for proposed merger Power Technology · 16 Jul 2026
- › NextEra and Dominion seek regulatory approval for proposed merger Energy Monitor · 16 Jul 2026
- › NextEra and Dominion Seek Merger Approval With $2.25B Customer Credit Plan Oilprice.com · 16 Jul 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in D's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
D trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | LOVEJOY KRISTIN G. | Director | 4,687 | $295,047 | |
| 2026-05-07 | KINGTON MARK J | Director | 5,005 | $315,065 | |
| 2026-05-05 | ROYAL PAMELA J | Director | 2,820 | $177,519 | |
| 2026-05-05 | HAGOOD D MAYBANK | Director | 2,820 | $177,519 | |
| 2026-05-05 | SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN | Director | 4,687 | $295,047 | |
| 2026-05-05 | BENNETT JAMES ANTHONY | Director | 2,820 | $177,519 | |
| 2026-05-05 | SPILMAN ROBERT HENKEL JR | Director | 5,084 | $320,038 | |
| 2026-05-05 | STORY SUSAN N | Director | 5,481 | $345,029 | |
| 2026-05-05 | LYASH JEFFREY J | Director | 2,820 | $177,519 | |
| 2026-05-05 | RIGBY JOSEPH M | Director | 3,273 | $206,035 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 9 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $61.94 | +7.9% | $0.67 | $1,090 | +9.0% |
| 2 months | $63.59 | +5.1% | $0.67 | $1,062 | +6.2% |
| 3 months | $62.22 | +7.4% | $0.67 | $1,085 | +8.5% |
| 6 months | $56.99 | +17.3% | $1.34 | $1,196 | +19.6% |
| 1 year | $53.26 | +25.5% | $2.67 | $1,305 | +30.5% |
| 2 years | $47.01 | +42.2% | $5.34 | $1,535 | +53.5% |
| 3 years | $45.93 | +45.5% | $8.02 | $1,630 | +63.0% |
| 5 years | $61.87 | +8.0% | $13.28 | $1,295 | +29.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.