The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 10.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $68.
Dominion Energy
D · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $53.4B · 15,200 employees
Dominion Energy, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-25 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 10 days ago
Screened 2026-09-25 · the tape above runs as of 09:01 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 60.68 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 63.61, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Dominion Energy holds its Markdown at $60.68. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 52 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 52 days |
| Price at the screen | $60.68 |
| Valuation | 21.00 trailing · 15.91 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.62 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 42.24% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 42.2% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 8.35% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 8.4% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 2.40% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 2.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Dominion Energy's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 42% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-04. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 5% discount to our $63.61 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 17.60% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-25 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 4.8% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 11 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +15% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-25 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsUtility shares priced beyond their steady worth
Paying a power bill feels routine and reliable, yet Dominion Energy trades at a clear premium to what the numbers support. The shares sit 11 percent above our fair value with an 18.6 times forward multiple, while a narrow moat and modest 10 percent return on equity do not justify the stretch.
We pass for straightforward reasons. Revenue growth looks solid at 23 percent but the valuation leaves little margin, the consensus target sits below the current price, and the stock fails our ethical screen on its debt ratio. Regulated utilities can offer stability, yet none of that offsets the gap here.
High leverage adds real exposure if rates stay elevated or if allowed returns come under pressure from regulators. The narrow moat offers little protection against those shifts. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.9xfairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 21.0xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 2.89 |
| EPS, forward | 3.81 |
| Revenue growth | +17.6%steady growth |
| Profit margin | 14.0%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 8.3%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | -17.20% |
| Dividend yield | 431.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.60a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.81below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.62steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.03% |
| 52-week range | 55.85 - 72.99 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $53.4B |
| Employees | 15,200 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeD trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 5.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 6.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- NextEra (NEE) and Dominion (D) Unveil a Bigger Pitch for Virginia Insider Monkey · 15d ago
- Jim Cramer Suggests Against Holding Dominion (D) Through the NextEra (NEE) Share Conversion Insider Monkey · 16d ago
- How AI concerns moved to the center of the midterm debate Investing.com · 16d ago
- Can NextEra (NEE) Preserve Its Earnings and Dividend Growth While Adding Dominion? Insider Monkey · 16d ago
- JPMorgan Sees Investment Banking and Trading Powering Q3 Growth Insider Monkey · 17d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | LOVEJOY KRISTIN G. | Director | 4,687 | $295,047 | |
| 2026-05-07 | KINGTON MARK J | Director | 5,005 | $315,065 | |
| 2026-05-05 | ROYAL PAMELA J | Director | 2,820 | $177,519 | |
| 2026-05-05 | HAGOOD D MAYBANK | Director | 2,820 | $177,519 | |
| 2026-05-05 | SUTHERLAND VANESSA ALLEN | Director | 4,687 | $295,047 | |
| 2026-05-05 | BENNETT JAMES ANTHONY | Director | 2,820 | $177,519 | |
| 2026-05-05 | SPILMAN ROBERT HENKEL JR | Director | 5,084 | $320,038 | |
| 2026-05-05 | STORY SUSAN N | Director | 5,481 | $345,029 | |
| 2026-05-05 | LYASH JEFFREY J | Director | 2,820 | $177,519 | |
| 2026-05-05 | RIGBY JOSEPH M | Director | 3,273 | $206,035 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-22 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-22 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-22 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-22 | David Taylor | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-15 | Don Beyer | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $61.94 | +7.9% | $0.67 | $1,090 | +9.0% |
| 2 months | $63.59 | +5.1% | $0.67 | $1,062 | +6.2% |
| 3 months | $62.22 | +7.4% | $0.67 | $1,085 | +8.5% |
| 6 months | $56.99 | +17.3% | $1.34 | $1,196 | +19.6% |
| 1 year | $53.26 | +25.5% | $2.67 | $1,305 | +30.5% |
| 2 years | $47.01 | +42.2% | $5.34 | $1,535 | +53.5% |
| 3 years | $45.93 | +45.5% | $8.02 | $1,630 | +63.0% |
| 5 years | $61.87 | +8.0% | $13.28 | $1,295 | +29.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever D does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.