United Airlines Holdings
Key Metrics
How this company measures up on the fundamentals that matter
About United Airlines Holdings
United Airlines Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides air transportation services in the United States, Canada, Atlantic, the Pacific, and Latin America. It transports people and cargo through its mainline and regional fleets. The company also offers ground handling, flight academy, frequent flyer award non-travel redemptions, and maintenance services for third parties. In addition, it provides freight and mail transportation services to commercial businesses, freight forwarders, logistics firms, and national postal services, as well as loyalty programs. The company distributes its products through direct channels, such as the Company's website and the Company's mobile app; and traditional travel agencies, online travel agencies, and other intermediaries. The company was formerly known as United Continental Holdings, Inc. and changed its name to United Airlines Holdings, Inc. in June 2019. United Airlines Holdings, Inc. was incorporated in 1968 and is based in Chicago, Illinois.
Ethical Screening
Five compliance checks based on AAOIFI standards — all must pass for ethical clearance
Valuation
Trading at $100 against a fair value of $282, a 65% discount. Fails ethical screen (Debt ratio). Ranks better than 74% of screened stocks.
Quantitative Intelligence
Statistical analysis of price behaviour, risk, and market regime — independent of fundamental data
Market Data
Trading characteristics and market positioning
Financial Health
Balance sheet strength and cash generation — the foundation of long-term value
Analyst Coverage
Recent Insider Activity
SEC Form 4 filings — what company insiders are buying and selling
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | NOCELLA ANDREW P | Officer | 7,000 | $631,330 | |
| 2026-02-27 | HART BRETT J | President | 79,324 | — | |
| 2026-02-27 | GEBO KATE | Officer | 35,144 | — | |
| 2026-02-27 | LESKINEN MICHAEL D. | Chief Financial Officer | 24,024 | — | |
| 2026-02-27 | BOKEMEIER BRIGITTE | Officer | 2,145 | — | |
| 2026-02-27 | NOCELLA ANDREW P | Officer | 31,098 | — | |
| 2026-02-27 | KIRBY JOHN SCOTT | Chief Executive Officer | 129,435 | — | |
| 2026-02-13 | KIRBY JOHN SCOTT | Chief Executive Officer | 199,235 | — | |
| 2026-02-13 | GEBO KATE | Officer | 56,122 | — | |
| 2026-02-13 | ENQVIST TORBJORN J | Chief Operating Officer | 56,699 | — |
Political Trading Activity
Congressional trading disclosures involving this instrument
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 May2026 | Sara Jacobs | Democrat | sell | 500K–1M |
| 6 May2026 | Sara Jacobs | Democrat | sell | 500K–1M |
| 2026-05-07 | Sara Jacobs | Democrat | Sale | 500K–1M |
| 2026-05-06 | Sara Jacobs | Democrat | Sale | 500K–1M |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What If You'd Bought UAL?
| Period | Price Then | Price Return | Divs/Share | $1,000 Became | Total Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Month | $96.62 | +6.4% | — | $1,064 | +6.4% |
| 2 Months | $96.40 | +6.6% | — | $1,066 | +6.6% |
| 3 Months | $86.53 | +18.8% | — | $1,188 | +18.8% |
| 6 Months | $108.39 | -5.2% | — | $948 | -5.2% |
| 1 Year | $83.20 | +23.5% | — | $1,235 | +23.5% |
| 2 Years | $53.03 | +93.8% | — | $1,938 | +93.8% |
| 3 Years | $50.42 | +103.9% | — | $2,039 | +103.9% |
| 5 Years | $56.52 | +81.9% | — | $1,819 | +81.9% |
Historical returns. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Prices from market close data.
Framework Review History
Timestamped framework reads — tracking how the analysis evolves over time
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Latest Analysis — UAL
Timestamped intelligence from our daily research pipeline
Framework Read · The Journal TSMC (TSM): Patient Money Is Accumulating the One Company the World Cannot Replace Titan Macro Desk • 5 July 2026 • First entry in the...
Framework Read · The Journal Oracle (ORCL): The Framework Likes the Chart. The Values Screen Will Not Let It In. Titan Macro Desk • 5 July 2026 • First entry...
Framework Read · The Journal Micron (MU): The Framework Says Markup. The CEO Sold Five Days Straight. Both Can Be Right. Titan Macro Desk • 5 July 2026 • First...
Titan Protect · Weekly Track Record Weekly Track Record: 324 Calls, 84.3% Hit Rate Titan Overwatch Desk • Week of 29 June to 3 July 2026 • Every call logged...
The Foundry · Complete Guides The Complete Guide to Reading the Jobs Report Titan Macro Desk • 4 July 2026 • 8 minute read Two days ago, US payrolls printed...
Grupo Cibest (CIB) Regime Case Study | Titan Protect CIB MARKUP Bancolombia: The Colombian Banking Giant's Markup Phase How Latin America's monetary easing cycle and domestic credit growth are driving...
James Hardie (JHX) Regime Case Study | Titan Protect JHX DISTRIBUTION James Hardie: Distribution in the Building Products Leader Why the world's largest fibre cement manufacturer is facing institutional selling...
Nova Ltd (NVMI) Regime Case Study | Titan Protect NVMI DISTRIBUTION Nova Ltd: Distribution in Semiconductor Metrology When advanced packaging tailwinds meet geopolitical complexity and semiconductor cycle dynamics Titan Macro...
Data sourced from public filings and market feeds. Not financial advice. Updated: 2025-12-31