The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 19.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 9% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 31%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (15 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $42.
Hub Group, Inc. HUBG
Clears both ethical standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Hub Group, Inc., a supply chain solutions provider, offers transportation and logistics management services in North America.
read at $47.73
Hub Group, Inc. holds its Distribution at $47.73.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 9 days |
| Price | $47.73 |
| Valuation | 27.43 trailing · 23.62 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 89.9 |
| Beta | 1.22 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $39.99 fair value estimate, weak competitive moat.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | -5.30% |
| Profit margin | 2.82% |
| Debt to equity | 28.41 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 13 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 21.5% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 5.2% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Logistics firm priced for a boom it lacks
Picture a North American freight network moving goods at full tilt, only to find volumes sliding. Hub Group sits right in that lane, running intermodal and dedicated trucking alongside broader logistics work. We pass because the shares trade at 51 dollars against a fair value near 40, with a forward multiple of 25 times earnings despite revenue already falling 5 percent.
The business earns just a 3 percent profit margin and delivers a 6 percent return on equity, numbers that look thin even before the weak competitive position is considered. Fourteen analysts sit on a hold rating with a 42 dollar median target, yet the market still prices the company for expansion it is not showing.
Cyclical exposure means any further slowdown in shipments could compress margins quickly, and the low return profile leaves little cushion if freight rates stay soft. Ethical checks clear, yet the valuation gap and thin returns outweigh that pass. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 23.6x a premium valuation |
| Trailing P/E | 27.4x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | -5.3% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 2.8% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 6.2% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.28 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.47 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.22 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $2.9B |
| Employees | 6,604 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in HUBG's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
HUBG trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 9% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 31%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (15 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $42.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-02 | ROSS JENELL | Director | 4,679 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | BETH KEVIN | Chief Financial Officer | 21,764 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | LAFRANCE THOMAS P. | Officer | 13,840 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | YABLON GARY H. | Director | 4,679 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | BANSAL DHRUV | Chief Technology Officer | 24,367 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | MEENTS BRIAN | Officer | 20,595 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | SLARK MARTIN P | Director | 4,679 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | FLANNERY MICHAEL E. | Director | 4,679 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | YEAGER DAVID P | Officer and Director | 60,928 | · | |
| 2026-01-02 | MCNITT PETER B. | Director | 4,679 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $41.74 | +6.1% | $0.13 | $1,064 | +6.4% |
| 2 months | $38.86 | +14.0% | $0.13 | $1,143 | +14.3% |
| 3 months | $34.68 | +27.8% | $0.25 | $1,285 | +28.5% |
| 6 months | $43.34 | +2.2% | $0.25 | $1,028 | +2.8% |
| 1 year | $33.74 | +31.3% | $0.63 | $1,332 | +33.2% |
| 2 years | $42.25 | +4.9% | $1.00 | $1,072 | +7.2% |
| 3 years | $37.33 | +18.7% | $1.25 | $1,220 | +22.0% |
| 5 years | $32.14 | +37.8% | $1.25 | $1,417 | +41.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.