The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 1.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 41%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (16 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $248.
FactSet FDS
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · FactSet Research Systems Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a financial digital platform and enterprise solutions provider for the investment community.
read at $263.03
FactSet holds its Markup at $263.03.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 108 days |
| Price | $263.03 |
| Valuation | 17.34 trailing · 13.35 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.72 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 3% discount to our $271.01 fair value, strong competitive moat, 6.40% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | 6.40% |
| Profit margin | 23.21% |
| Debt to equity | 77.28 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 16 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Business activity: Financials sector Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Data platform trips on ethics test
Every fund manager tapping a terminal for clean company data or portfolio numbers relies on a handful of specialist platforms that sit between raw filings and real decisions. FactSet built one of the stronger ones, with a genuine moat, 27 percent ROE, and 23 percent margins that most software names would envy. Yet the numbers still point to a pass.
We are staying away first because the business fails our ethical screen on activity grounds. That screen exists for exactly these cases, and no amount of operational quality overrides it. The modest 5 percent margin of safety at the current price and the 6 percent revenue growth simply do not change the call.
Analysts already see limited upside, with a median target below the current level and a hold rating across the board. Forward earnings sit at 13 times, which looks reasonable until you remember the ethical red line sits in front of any valuation debate. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.4x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 17.3x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 6.4% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 23.2% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 27.0% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.77 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 0.68 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.72 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $9.4B |
| Employees | 12,840 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in FDS's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
FDS trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 41%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (16 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $248.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | WARREN JOSHUA | Chief Financial Officer | 2,272 | · | |
| 2026-01-15 | FRANK MALCOLM | Director | 713 | · | |
| 2026-01-15 | ABRAMS ROBIN ANN | Director | 604 | · | |
| 2026-01-15 | HYLTON LAURIE G | Director | 439 | · | |
| 2026-01-15 | SIEGEL LAURIE A | Director | 626 | · | |
| 2026-01-15 | SHAVEL LEE M | Director | 571 | · | |
| 2026-01-15 | EILAM BARAK | Director | 439 | · | |
| 2026-01-15 | CHOY SIEW KAI | Director | 439 | · | |
| 2026-01-15 | TEJADA MARIA TERESA | Director | 439 | · | |
| 2026-01-15 | WIESEL SHLOMO ELISHA | Director | 571 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $218.13 | +12.7% | $1.16 | $1,132 | +13.2% |
| 2 months | $210.57 | +16.7% | $1.16 | $1,173 | +17.3% |
| 3 months | $202.61 | +21.3% | $1.16 | $1,219 | +21.9% |
| 6 months | $288.64 | -14.9% | $2.26 | $859 | -14.1% |
| 1 year | $418.46 | -41.3% | $4.46 | $598 | -40.2% |
| 2 years | $395.74 | -37.9% | $8.68 | $643 | -35.7% |
| 3 years | $383.79 | -36.0% | $12.66 | $673 | -32.7% |
| 5 years | $311.65 | -21.1% | $19.66 | $852 | -14.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.