The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (25 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $130. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Dollar Tree
DLTR · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $21.9B · 35,181 employees
Dollar Tree, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-21 · not a live quote
Screened 2026-09-21 · the tape above runs as of 11:00 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 112.33 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 121.01, over the last year.
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political selling, disclosed 2026-08-19
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
Dollar Tree holds its Distribution at $112.33. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 26 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 26 days |
| Price at the screen | $112.33 |
| Valuation | 13.77 trailing · 14.20 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.66 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 52.39% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 52.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 5.33% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 5.3% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 8% discount to our $121.01 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 7.00% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-21 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 7.7% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 25 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +25% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-21 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsDiscount aisles hide a heavy debt load
Walk down any Dollar Tree aisle and the low prices feel like a win for households watching every penny. Yet the company carries too much debt for our ethical screen, which rules it out before valuation even enters the frame. Forward earnings sit at 16.4 times with 7 percent revenue growth and a 7 percent profit margin, numbers that look ordinary rather than compelling.
We pass because the debt ratio breach outweighs the 34 percent ROE and narrow moat. Twenty-five analysts sit on a hold rating with a $125 median target, almost exactly where the shares trade today. The modest 11 percent gap to our fair value does not change the ethical call.
The real risk is that leverage stays elevated while consumer spending slows, leaving little room if margins compress further. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 14.2xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 13.8xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 8.16 |
| EPS, forward | 7.91 |
| Revenue growth | +7.0%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 8.0%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 46.0%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 4.72% |
| Debt to equity | 2.24heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.13adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.66steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.05% |
| 52-week range | 84.71 - 142.40 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $21.9B |
| Employees | 35,181 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeDLTR trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (25 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $130. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (25 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $130. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $124. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $124. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 2.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $124. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $124. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 2.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $124. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 15.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $124.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $124.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Dollar Tree shares key update on higher prices TheStreet · 3d ago
- Will Interparfums' Cavalli License Extension Boost Brand Growth? Zacks · 4d ago
- How gig delivery apps became retail infrastructure Quartz · 6d ago
- Dollar General Sees Shopper Pressure Persisting, Bets on Value and Delivery Growth MarketBeat · 6d ago
- Is Dollar Tree Stock Outperforming the S&P 500? Barchart · 7d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-01 | AFLATOONI ROBERT | Chief Technology Officer | 8,739 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | SCHUMACHER STEVEN | Officer | 6,899 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | WENG ROXANNE RENA | Officer | 5,979 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | MITCHELL JOHN S JR | Officer | 7,359 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | BEEBE BRENT A | Officer | 7,359 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | KONRAD JOCELYN Z | Officer | 5,979 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | MAHESHWARI ADITYA | Officer | 1,955 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | CREEDON MICHAEL C JR | Chief Executive Officer | 44,158 | · | |
| 2026-04-01 | GLENDINNING STEWART F | Chief Financial Officer | 18,399 | · | |
| 2026-03-31 | AFLATOONI ROBERT | Chief Technology Officer | 1,261 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-19 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-19 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-19 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-07-20 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-07-20 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $90.02 | +21.9% | · | $1,219 | +21.9% |
| 2 months | $99.55 | +10.2% | · | $1,102 | +10.2% |
| 3 months | $111.70 | -1.8% | · | $982 | -1.8% |
| 6 months | $129.97 | -15.6% | · | $844 | -15.6% |
| 1 year | $93.12 | +17.8% | · | $1,178 | +17.8% |
| 2 years | $110.19 | -0.4% | · | $996 | -0.4% |
| 3 years | $131.77 | -16.7% | · | $833 | -16.7% |
| 5 years | $101.18 | +8.4% | · | $1,084 | +8.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever DLTR does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.