The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 3.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 7%. The street (10 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $200.
Avery Dennison AVY
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Avery Dennison Corporation operates as a materials science and digital identification solutions company in the North America, Europe, the Middle East, North Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
read at $169.13
Avery Dennison holds its Markup at $169.13.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 146 days |
| Price | $169.13 |
| Valuation | 18.34 trailing · 15.16 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.83 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $149.37 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 7.00% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 7.00% |
| Profit margin | 7.66% |
| Debt to equity | 164.75 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 10 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 42.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 19.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Labels mask the cycle and the debt
Walk into any supermarket and the labels on the shelves look permanent. Avery Dennison supplies most of them, yet demand still swings hard when factories and retailers cut spending. At 160 dollars against a fair value of 149, the shares already price in perfection while the ethical screen flags excessive debt. We pass.
Revenue growth sits at 7 percent and margins at 8 percent, numbers that look respectable until you remember this is a cyclical packaging business. A forward multiple of 14.4 times feels cheap only if earnings stay at peak. History shows they rarely do, and the narrow moat gives little protection when volumes drop.
High return on equity of 31 percent cannot offset the debt-ratio failure or the risk that current profits prove fleeting. The market may still like the name, but the combination of cyclical exposure and ethical red flags leaves no margin for error. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 15.2x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 18.3x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 7.0% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 7.7% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 30.9% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.65 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.15 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.83 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $12.9B |
| Employees | 35,000 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in AVY's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
AVY trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 7%. The street (10 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $200.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | WAGNER WILLIAM RAYMOND | Director | 1,087 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | SIEWERT PATRICK T | Director | 1,087 | $178,279 | |
| 2026-05-01 | LOPEZ ANDRES ALBERTO | Director | 1,087 | $178,279 | |
| 2026-05-01 | DICKSON WARD H | Director | 1,087 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | MEJIA MARIA FERNANDA | Director | 1,087 | $178,279 | |
| 2026-05-01 | ALFORD BRADLEY A | Director | 1,087 | $178,279 | |
| 2026-05-01 | BUTIER MITCHELL R | Director | 1,763 | $289,150 | |
| 2026-05-01 | REVERBERI FRANCESCA | Director | 1,087 | · | |
| 2026-03-12 | BUTIER MITCHELL R | Director | 33,000 | $5,707,209 | |
| 2026-03-10 | BUTIER MITCHELL R | Director | 40,000 | $7,032,278 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 15 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $160.99 | -2.3% | $1.00 | $983 | -1.7% |
| 2 months | $170.07 | -7.5% | $1.00 | $931 | -6.9% |
| 3 months | $169.92 | -7.5% | $1.00 | $931 | -6.9% |
| 6 months | $179.61 | -12.4% | $1.94 | $886 | -11.4% |
| 1 year | $176.11 | -10.7% | $3.82 | $915 | -8.5% |
| 2 years | $215.76 | -27.1% | $7.40 | $763 | -23.7% |
| 3 years | $153.54 | +2.4% | $10.71 | $1,094 | +9.4% |
| 5 years | $200.83 | -21.7% | $16.56 | $866 | -13.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.