The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 17% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bullish. Over the past year the shares are up 18%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (2 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $66.
Sun Life Financial Inc SLF
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Sun Life Financial Inc., a financial services company, provides asset management, wealth, insurance and health solutions to individual and institutional customers in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland…
read at $82.93
Sun Life Financial Inc holds its Markup at $82.93.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 19 days |
| Price | $82.93 |
| Valuation | 21.77 trailing · 13.69 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 0.82 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | 0.20% |
| Profit margin | 8.85% |
| Debt to equity | 54.11 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 2 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its excluded industry: insurance - diversified. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Excluded industry: Insurance - Diversified Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Insurance giants fail our ethical line
Picture a Canadian insurer collecting premiums from families across Asia and North America. Sun Life does exactly that yet it lands on our excluded list because diversified insurance sits outside our ethical screen.
We pass for that single reason. The numbers add little temptation anyway. Revenue is flat, the narrow moat offers slim protection and the shares trade eight percent above our fair value with a forward multiple of 13.5 times that leaves scant margin.
Analyst targets sit well below the current price and returns on equity remain modest. Currency moves and regulatory shifts in multiple markets add further uncertainty. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.7x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 21.8x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 0.2% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 8.8% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 12.0% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.54 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 48.18 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.82 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $46.0B |
| Employees | 32,151 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to Canada and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on SLF
- › MFC Outperforms Industry, Hits 52-Week High: How to Play the Stock Zacks · 21d ago
- › TELUS (TSX:T) Launches AI Consortium With Canadian Finance And Tech Leaders Simply Wall St. · 25d ago
- › AI Consortium Launch With TELUS and Scotiabank Could Be A Game Changer For Sun Life (TSX:SLF) Simply Wall St. · 27d ago
- › Is Sun Life Financial (TSX:SLF) Expensive On Its AI Consortium Move? Simply Wall St. · 28d ago
- › News of the day: Trade surplus widens, CRTC comes down on phone fees, Scotiabank's new AI consortium, Ottawa invests in Teck, Canadians using BNPL and more Financial Post · 28d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in SLF's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $69.86 | +7.3% | $0.70 | $1,083 | +8.3% |
| 2 months | $64.65 | +15.9% | $0.70 | $1,170 | +17.0% |
| 3 months | $62.26 | +20.4% | $0.70 | $1,215 | +21.5% |
| 6 months | $58.53 | +28.1% | $1.37 | $1,304 | +30.4% |
| 1 year | $63.44 | +18.1% | $1.37 | $1,203 | +20.3% |
| 2 years | $46.50 | +61.2% | $3.79 | $1,693 | +69.3% |
| 3 years | $45.39 | +65.1% | $6.09 | $1,786 | +78.6% |
| 5 years | $43.59 | +72.0% | $10.26 | $1,955 | +95.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.