The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 14.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (5 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $86.
First American Financial Corporation FAF
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · First American Financial Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides financial services.
read at $74.99
First American Financial Corporation holds its Markup at $74.99.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 6 days |
| Price | $74.99 |
| Valuation | 10.40 trailing · 10.14 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.24 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 15.00% |
| Profit margin | 9.33% |
| Debt to equity | 49.42 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 6 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: insurance. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: insurance Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Ethics screen blocks this low multiple insurer
Picture a family closing on their first home. The paperwork flows through title checks and warranties that most buyers never think about. First American handles that flow and the numbers look steady enough, with revenue up 16 percent, a forward earnings multiple of 10.1 times and a stated margin of safety near 27 percent. Yet the business sits inside insurance, a sector our screen rejects outright, so the valuation edge never comes into play.
We pass for that single ethical reason, even though analysts see further upside to 84 dollars and return on equity sits at 13 percent. The screen exists to keep certain industries off the table regardless of price or growth. No amount of apparent discount changes the call.
The real risk is that ethical lines get blurred when numbers look attractive. Investors who ignore the screen often discover later that the cheap multiple reflected constraints they chose not to see. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 10.1x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 10.4x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 15.0% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 9.3% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 13.8% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.49 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 0.40 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 1.24 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $7.7B |
| Employees | 19,102 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on FAF
- › HIG's Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates on Strong Investment Income Zacks · 22d ago
- › RLI's Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates on Premium Growth, Investment Income Zacks · 22d ago
- › First American Financial Corp (FAF) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Commercial Revenue ... GuruFocus.com · 23d ago
- › First American Financial Q2 Earnings Call Highlights MarketBeat · 23d ago
- › FAF Q2 Earnings Top Estimates on Title Strength, Investment Income Zacks · 23d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in FAF's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
FAF trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 4% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 18%. The street (5 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $86.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $67.89 | -2.2% | $0.55 | $986 | -1.4% |
| 2 months | $62.79 | +5.8% | $0.55 | $1,066 | +6.6% |
| 3 months | $62.87 | +5.6% | $0.55 | $1,065 | +6.5% |
| 6 months | $63.34 | +4.8% | $1.10 | $1,066 | +6.6% |
| 1 year | $55.17 | +20.4% | $2.20 | $1,243 | +24.3% |
| 2 years | $49.23 | +34.9% | $4.89 | $1,448 | +44.8% |
| 3 years | $50.68 | +31.0% | $6.48 | $1,438 | +43.8% |
| 5 years | $55.51 | +19.6% | $10.60 | $1,387 | +38.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.