The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 2.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 18% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 66%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (20 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $948. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter.
Goldman Sachs GS
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a financial institution, provides a range of financial services for corporations, financial institutions, governments, and individuals in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia.
read at $1,061.23
Goldman Sachs holds its Markup at $1,061.23.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 50 days |
| Price | $1,061.23 |
| Valuation | 16.37 trailing · 14.47 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.29 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 6% discount to our $1,125.17 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 42.50% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 42.50% |
| Profit margin | 31.04% |
| Debt to equity | 647.15 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 20 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Business activity: Financials sector Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Banking giant fails the ethical screen outright
Every big corporate deal or government bond issue eventually runs through names like this one. Goldman Sachs is the most respected player in capital markets yet we are staying away for one reason that has nothing to do with the numbers. The business activity screen flags it on ethical grounds and that is exactly what the screen is meant to catch.
Revenue is growing at 42 percent with a 31 percent profit margin and 17 percent ROE, while the forward multiple sits at 14.8 times. The shares trade only 4 percent below our fair value and analysts sit on a hold rating with a median target of 1148. None of that moves the needle once the ethical test is failed.
Risk sits in the same business lines that triggered the screen plus the usual cyclical swings in trading and deal flow. Even a moderate moat does not offset the clear ethical red flag here. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 14.5x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 16.4x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 42.5% growing very fast |
| Profit margin | 31.0% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 17.0% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 6.47 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 2.57 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.29 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $313.1B |
| Employees | 47,000 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on GS
- › Biggest Wall Street Rotation Since 2020 Shows AI Crowding Risks Bloomberg · 2d ago
- › Goldman Sachs, Barclays cut Robinhood price targets despite earnings beat TheStreet · 2d ago
- › The 24-Hour Race to Salvage Situational Awareness’ Souring Bets Bloomberg · 3d ago
- › Sector Update: Financial Stocks Advance Late Afternoon MT Newswires · 3d ago
- › Goldman Sachs Stock Rises 3.2% as AlphaAI Platform Launches GuruFocus.com · 3d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in GS's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
GS trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 18% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 66%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (20 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $948. Insiders have been net sellers over the past quarter.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | Coleman Denis P. | CFO | Sale | 6,857 | $6,675,613 |
| 2026-05-06 | Ruemmler Kathryn H. | GC, GC | Sale | 14,292 | $13,421,235 |
| 2026-05-01 | Solomon David M | COB, CEO | Sale | 10,301 | $9,571,354 |
| 2026-05-01 | Fredman Sheara J | Chief Accounting Officer | Sale | 683 | $634,927 |
| 2026-05-01 | Ruemmler Kathryn H. | GC, GC | Sale | 1,116 | $1,044,782 |
| 2026-04-23 | Golten Alex S | CHIEF RISK OFFICER | Sale | 2,292 | $2,143,045 |
| 2026-04-17 | Golten Alex S | CHIEF RISK OFFICER | Sale | 1,115 | $1,024,895 |
| 2026-02-11 | Rogers John F.W. | EVP | Sale | 15,855 | $15,210,754 |
| 2026-02-09 | Coleman Denis P. | CFO | Sale | 11,623 | $10,943,892 |
| 2026-02-09 | Golten Alex S | CHIEF RISK OFFICER | Sale | 2,292 | $2,143,045 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 15K–50K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 8 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 7 May2026 | Tim Moore | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 6 May2026 | Dave McCormick | Republican | buy | 100K–250K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $940.71 | +6.5% | $4.50 | $1,070 | +7.0% |
| 2 months | $903.82 | +10.8% | $4.50 | $1,113 | +11.3% |
| 3 months | $784.06 | +27.8% | $4.50 | $1,283 | +28.3% |
| 6 months | $902.28 | +11.0% | $9.00 | $1,120 | +12.0% |
| 1 year | $602.74 | +66.2% | $17.00 | $1,690 | +69.0% |
| 2 years | $435.47 | +130.0% | $29.00 | $2,367 | +136.7% |
| 3 years | $313.22 | +219.8% | $40.00 | $3,326 | +232.6% |
| 5 years | $334.92 | +199.1% | $58.00 | $3,164 | +216.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.