The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (14 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $416.
LPL Financial Holdings Inc LPLA
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · LPL Financial Holdings Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides an integrated platform of brokerage and investment advisory services to independent financial advisors and financial advisors at institutions in the U…
read at $342.40
LPL Financial Holdings Inc holds its Markup at $342.40.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 2 days |
| Price | $342.40 |
| Valuation | 29.85 trailing · 11.67 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 0.51 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 35.00% |
| Profit margin | 5.05% |
| Debt to equity | 132.28 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 14 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its excluded industry: capital markets. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Excluded industry: Capital Markets Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
LPL Financial fails our ethical screen outright
Independent advisors in every state route client money through platforms that bundle brokerage and advice. LPL Financial delivers exactly that service at scale, with revenue up 35 percent and a 20 percent return on equity. On paper the 11 times forward earnings and narrow moat look reasonable next to the 29 percent gap to our fair value.
We pass because the business sits in capital markets, an industry our screen excludes on principle. No valuation discount or analyst target at 401 dollars changes that line. The ethical filter exists to keep us out of entire sectors regardless of growth or cash generation.
Profit margins sit at just 5 percent, leaving little room for regulatory or market shocks common in this field. Currency and interest-rate swings add further pressure that the narrow moat does little to offset. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 11.7x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 29.9x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 35.0% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | 5.1% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 20.5% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.32 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 2.45 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.51 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $27.4B |
| Employees | 9,901 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on LPLA
- › 1 Profitable Stock Worth Your Attention and 2 We Avoid StockStory · 17d ago
- › LPL Financial Hires $2.4 Billion Financial Advisory Team From U.S. Bank Barrons.com · 18d ago
- › LPL Financial Adds $2.4B HNW Team From U.S. Bank Wealth Management · 19d ago
- › Treasury Yields Retreat on Signs of U.S.-Iran De-Escalation The Wall Street Journal · 24d ago
- › Stifel, Commonwealth Top JD Power’s Advisor Satisfaction Rankings Barrons.com · 24d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in LPLA's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2025-04-02 | Val Hoyle | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| 11 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $288.73 | +0.9% | $0.30 | $1,010 | +1.0% |
| 2 months | $312.20 | -6.7% | $0.30 | $934 | -6.6% |
| 3 months | $289.31 | +0.7% | $0.30 | $1,008 | +0.8% |
| 6 months | $386.67 | -24.7% | $0.60 | $755 | -24.5% |
| 1 year | $377.84 | -22.9% | $1.20 | $774 | -22.6% |
| 2 years | $278.66 | +4.5% | $2.40 | $1,054 | +5.4% |
| 3 years | $201.92 | +44.2% | $3.60 | $1,460 | +46.0% |
| 5 years | $135.76 | +114.5% | $5.70 | $2,187 | +118.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.