The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 4.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 43%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $98. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Robinhood Markets HOOD
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Robinhood Markets, Inc.
read at $95.65
Robinhood Markets holds its Markup at $95.65.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 8 days |
| Price | $95.65 |
| Valuation | 46.43 trailing · 31.10 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 2.34 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $86.81 fair value estimate, strong competitive moat, 15.10% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 15.10% |
| Profit margin | 41.12% |
| Debt to equity | 140.48 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 26 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity screen. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Business activity: Financials sector Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Robinhood trades like the game never stops
Robinhood turned stock picking into a swipe on your phone, and the platform now pulls in serious revenue with 15 percent growth, 41 percent margins and a 21 percent return on equity. Yet the shares sit at 32.5 times forward earnings against our fair value of 86.81, a 13 percent premium that leaves no safety margin. We pass.
The business also fails our ethical screen on business activity grounds, which is reason enough on its own to step aside. Strong moat or not, that screen exists to keep us out of areas we do not want to own.
Analysts may still chase a 128 target, but high expectations around trading volumes can swing fast when markets calm or rules tighten. The combination of stretched valuation and the ethical flag makes this one to avoid. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 31.1x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 46.4x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 15.1% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 41.1% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 21.5% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.40 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.11 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 2.34 much more volatile than the market |
| Market cap | $86.1B |
| Employees | 2,900 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on HOOD
- › Robinhood CFO Shiv Verma Sells 3,982 Shares for $457,000 -- Here's What it Signals for the Stock Motley Fool · 15d ago
- › AI can now access your credit cards — how to protect yourself from being scammed Moneywise · 15d ago
- › Robinhood Targets 27.6M Customers as Chain Moves Beyond Memecoin Rush CryptoProwl · 15d ago
- › Goldman Sachs raises price target on Robinhood ahead of earnings TheStreet · 16d ago
- › Buffett Plans to Give Away More in Next 8 Years — Are Trump Accounts Next on His List? Benzinga · 16d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in HOOD's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
HOOD trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 43%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $98. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 43%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $98. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 43%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $98. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 43%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $98. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 43%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $98. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 21.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 43%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $98. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 20%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 43%. The street (24 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $98.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | VERMA SHIV | Chief Financial Officer | 5,436 | $420,536 | |
| 2026-05-04 | GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR | Officer | 10,000 | $768,908 | |
| 2026-04-27 | PINNER JEFFREY TSVI | Chief Technology Officer | 5,835 | $489,687 | |
| 2026-04-16 | BHATT BAIJU PRAFULKUMAR | Director | 57,261 | · | |
| 2026-04-16 | BHATT BAIJU PRAFULKUMAR | Director | 57,261 | $4,946,061 | |
| 2026-04-15 | QUIRK STEVEN M | Officer | 8,540 | $725,302 | |
| 2026-04-15 | VERMA SHIV | Chief Financial Officer | 5,436 | $466,717 | |
| 2026-04-06 | TENEV VLADIMIR | Chief Executive Officer | 375,000 | · | |
| 2026-04-06 | GALLAGHER DANIEL MARTIN JR | Officer | 10,000 | $698,451 | |
| 2026-04-06 | TENEV VLADIMIR | Chief Executive Officer | 375,000 | $26,187,704 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $80.78 | +7.8% | · | $1,078 | +7.8% |
| 2 months | $69.19 | +25.8% | · | $1,258 | +25.8% |
| 3 months | $76.12 | +14.4% | · | $1,144 | +14.4% |
| 6 months | $123.38 | -29.4% | · | $706 | -29.4% |
| 1 year | $72.51 | +20.1% | · | $1,201 | +20.1% |
| 2 years | $23.42 | +271.8% | · | $3,718 | +271.8% |
| 3 years | $9.41 | +825.2% | · | $9,252 | +825.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.