The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 8% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 24%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 24%. The street (13 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $24.
XP Inc. XP
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · XP Inc.
read at $17.20
XP Inc. holds its Distribution at $17.20.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 5 days |
| Price | $17.20 |
| Valuation | 8.87 trailing · 7.40 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.12 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 9.70% |
| Profit margin | 28.85% |
| Debt to equity | 677.35 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 13 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: financial services Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Brazilian Brokerage Hits Ethical Wall Despite Cheap Looks
Picture a young professional in Sao Paulo opening an app to buy shares or a fund for the first time. XP built the platform that makes those trades simple and cheap across Brazil. Revenue is growing at 10 percent, margins sit near 29 percent and return on equity reaches 23 percent, all at a forward multiple of just 7.1 times. On paper the numbers look attractive next to a fair value well above the current price.
We pass regardless. The business sits squarely inside financial services, which triggers an automatic fail on our ethical screen. No amount of margin of safety or analyst buy ratings changes that rule. We apply the screen precisely so we do not have to debate individual cases after the fact.
The low multiple also carries the usual warning for financial platforms. Revenue can slow quickly when Brazilian rates or markets turn, and currency swings add another layer of volatility that is hard to forecast. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 7.4x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 8.9x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Revenue growth | 9.7% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 28.8% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 22.9% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 6.77 heavy leverage — higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.39 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.12 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $8.9B |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to Cayman Islands and to currency swings; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in XP's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
XP trades on Nasdaq (the company is based in Cayman Islands). As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 May2026 | Rick Allen | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 6 May2026 | John Fetterman | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $18.67 | -20.0% | · | $800 | -20.0% |
| 2 months | $19.99 | -25.3% | · | $747 | -25.3% |
| 3 months | $18.06 | -17.3% | · | $827 | -17.3% |
| 6 months | $17.75 | -15.9% | · | $842 | -15.9% |
| 1 year | $19.76 | -24.4% | $0.18 | $765 | -23.5% |
| 2 years | $17.56 | -14.9% | $0.83 | $898 | -10.2% |
| 3 years | $18.32 | -18.4% | $2.14 | $932 | -6.8% |
| 5 years | $39.38 | -62.1% | $2.14 | $434 | -56.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.