The framework has shifted from distribution to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 15.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 47%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $117.
TransMedics Group, Inc. TMDX
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · TransMedics Group, Inc., a commercial-stage medical technology company, engages in transforming organ transplant therapy for end-stage organ failure patients in the United States and internationally.
read at $83.89
TransMedics Group, Inc. holds its Accumulation at $83.89.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 15 days |
| Price | $83.89 |
| Valuation | 21.73 trailing · 35.34 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 1.88 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 20.70% |
| Profit margin | 22.69% |
| Debt to equity | 167.50 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 10 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 48.6% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 53.6% of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Keeping organs alive changes transplant odds
When a donor heart or lung has to cross continents, time is the real killer. TransMedics built a portable perfusion system that keeps organs functioning until they reach the table. Revenue is growing 21 percent, margins sit at 27 percent and return on equity reaches 45 percent, all while passing the ethical screen.
Yet the opportunity rating is none. At 26.7 times forward earnings the valuation leaves scant margin for slower uptake and the competitive moat is still unknown, so the setup does not clear our bar despite the gap to fair value.
Reimbursement shifts or slower hospital adoption could blunt the growth. The 22 percent discount to fair value offers some protection but not enough to offset the unknowns. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 35.3x priced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 21.7x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 20.7% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | 22.7% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 36.3% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.67 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 6.63 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.88 much more volatile than the market |
| Market cap | $2.9B |
| Employees | 898 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in TMDX's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
TMDX trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 47%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (9 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $117.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $64.30 | +16.3% | · | $1,163 | +16.3% |
| 2 months | $114.00 | -34.4% | · | $656 | -34.4% |
| 3 months | $121.31 | -38.4% | · | $616 | -38.4% |
| 6 months | $127.62 | -41.4% | · | $586 | -41.4% |
| 1 year | $140.86 | -46.9% | · | $531 | -46.9% |
| 2 years | $144.67 | -48.3% | · | $517 | -48.3% |
| 3 years | $79.35 | -5.8% | · | $942 | -5.8% |
| 5 years | $28.31 | +164.1% | · | $2,641 | +164.1% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.