The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 22.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is holding around 39% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 129%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 33%. The street (2 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $21.
Sigma Lithium Corporation
SGML · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $1.0B · 560 employees
Sigma Lithium Corporation engages in the exploration and development of lithium deposits in Brazil.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-16
Screened 2026-09-16 · the tape above runs as of 23:00 UTC · 20 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 9.00 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 12.15, over the last year.
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against today's price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
Sigma Lithium Corporation holds its Distribution at $9.00. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 7 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 7 days |
| Price at the screen | $9.00 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 5.22 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.60 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 48.79% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 48.8% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 2.59% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 2.6% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 2.02% | Below 5% | Only 2.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-16 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 35.0% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 2 covering, consensus Strong Buy. The average target sits +119% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-16 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsLithium miner valuation ignores the cycle swings
Picture an EV battery boom that suddenly cools. Orders slow, prices drop and a Brazilian lithium developer with no profits yet feels the squeeze hard. Sigma Lithium shows a forward multiple of just 6.1 times, yet revenue is already falling 11 percent and margins sit at minus 42 percent, so the cheap reading is mostly an illusion created by peak-cycle thinking.
We pass because this is a classic cyclical value trap. The low multiple and 35 percent gap to our fair value number look tempting on a screen, yet negative 49 percent ROE and an unknown moat tell us earnings are fragile and tied to commodity swings rather than durable demand. Two analysts see a much higher target, but history shows these forecasts often collapse when battery makers cut purchases.
Risk sits in the commodity price and funding exposure that can wipe out thin balance sheets quickly. Ethical screen clears, yet the numbers still flag a business that needs sustained high lithium prices to justify any ownership. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 5.2xcheap for a company growing this fast |
| EPS, trailing | -0.24 |
| EPS, forward | 1.72 |
| Revenue growth | +223.9%growing very fast |
| Profit margin | -19.3%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -31.6%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 4.35% |
| Debt to equity | 3.37heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 0.34below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.60steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.05% |
| 52-week range | 4.62 - 24.48 |
| Market cap | $1.0B |
| Employees | 560 |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; its business and earnings are exposed to Canada and to currency swings; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeSGML trades on Nasdaq (the company is based in Canada). As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from markdown to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 35.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is holding around 39% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 129%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 33%. The street (2 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $21.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is holding around 39% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 129%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 33%. The street (2 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $21.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $20.30 | -36.0% | · | $640 | -36.0% |
| 2 months | $14.85 | -12.5% | · | $875 | -12.5% |
| 3 months | $11.94 | +8.8% | · | $1,088 | +8.8% |
| 6 months | $11.70 | +11.0% | · | $1,110 | +11.0% |
| 1 year | $5.68 | +128.7% | · | $2,287 | +128.7% |
| 2 years | $13.99 | -7.2% | · | $929 | -7.2% |
| 3 years | $41.78 | -68.9% | · | $311 | -68.9% |
| 5 years | $4.94 | +163.0% | · | $2,630 | +163.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever SGML does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.