The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 51%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 36%. The street (9 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $6.
Lithium Americas Corp. LAC
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Lithium Americas Corp.
read at $2.95
Lithium Americas Corp. holds its Distribution at $2.95.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · screen not yet scored
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 133 days |
| Price | $2.95 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · -16.09 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | Not scored · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 3.38 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Profit margin | 0.00% |
| Debt to equity | 46.80 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 9 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This security has not been fully scored against the values screen yet.
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Nevada Lithium Hopes Hit Data Shortfall
Picture a huge Nevada lithium deposit that still needs years of building before it ships a single tonne. Lithium Americas sits at that exact stage, with no profits yet and an opportunity rating of none. We pass because the ethical screen returns insufficient data and the business sits in a notoriously cyclical sector where early numbers rarely tell the full story.
Forward earnings sit at a negative 16 times while profit margins and return on equity both read zero and minus five percent. The quoted price of 2.95 dollars sits below our fair value of 3.98 dollars, yet the gap does not create an opening once cyclical swings and missing ratio data are factored in. Nine analysts hold a median target of five dollars, but that consensus does not shift our stance.
The real danger lies in mistaking a low multiple for value inside a commodity cycle that can turn sharply. Peak earnings often arrive just before the next downturn, leaving investors holding assets that never repeat the prior peak. Ethical gaps around basic financial ratios add another layer that cannot be ignored. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | -16.1x |
| Profit margin | 0.0% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -5.0% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 0.47 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 7.36 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 3.38 much more volatile than the market |
| Market cap | $1.0B |
| Employees | 94 |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; it already moves more than the market on an average day; its business and earnings are exposed to Canada and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in LAC's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
LAC trades on the NYSE (the company is based in Canada). As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 May2026 | Suzan DelBene | Democrat | buy | 250K–500K |
| 2026-05-04 | Suzan DelBene | Democrat | Purchase | 250K–500K |
| 2026-04-15 | Richard Blumenthal | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 15K–50K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $5.79 | -28.1% | · | $719 | -28.1% |
| 2 months | $4.07 | +2.3% | · | $1,023 | +2.3% |
| 3 months | $4.55 | -8.5% | · | $915 | -8.5% |
| 6 months | $5.33 | -21.9% | · | $781 | -21.9% |
| 1 year | $2.76 | +50.9% | · | $1,509 | +50.9% |
| 2 years | $3.07 | +35.6% | · | $1,356 | +35.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.