The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 10.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 63%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 26%. The street (15 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $68.
Polaris Inc.
PII · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $3.3B · 14,500 employees
Polaris Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-15
Screened 2026-09-15 · the tape above runs as of 23:00 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 57.89 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 60.55, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against today's price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Polaris Inc. holds its Markdown at $57.89. The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days |
| Price at the screen | $57.89 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 17.04 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 1.28 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 34.02% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 34.0% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 7.67% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 7.7% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Conscience OverlayThe quantitative screen above is arithmetic. Separately, community boycott lists cite this company: Listed by AFSC Investigate Database for: Supplies ATVs to the Israeli military and settlements. The desk records that flag here without folding it into the verdict: the screen measures the balance sheet, the overlay informs the conscience, and they are different judgements that belong to different owners. The second one is yours.
The Fair Value Range
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-15 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 4.6% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 15 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +26% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-15 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsPolaris sells toys no one can afford right now
Picture a weekend rider looking at a new ATV while credit cards are maxed and fuel prices bite. Polaris makes those machines across off-road, on-road and marine lines yet it is losing money fast. Revenue is up eight percent but margins sit at minus six percent and return on equity has fallen to minus forty five percent. At twenty three point five times forward earnings the shares trade well above our fair value of fifty five dollars sixty seven, so there is no margin of safety and no reason to step in.
The analyst crowd sees the same picture and calls it a hold with a seventy dollar target. That leaves the stock looking both expensive and fragile in a consumer cyclical business where demand can vanish when rates stay high.
Margins this weak inside a sector tied to discretionary spending point to real cyclical risk rather than a temporary dip. Currency moves and dealer inventory swings add further pressure. Ethical screen cleared but the numbers do not justify ownership.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 17.0xpriced for continued growth |
| EPS, trailing | -4.60 |
| EPS, forward | 3.40 |
| Revenue growth | +8.8%steady growth |
| Profit margin | -3.5%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -25.6%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 8.41% |
| Dividend yield | 383.00% |
| Debt to equity | 2.45heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.20adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.28moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.14% |
| 52-week range | 47.14 - 77.98 |
| Market cap | $3.3B |
| Employees | 14,500 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradePII trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 0.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 63%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 26%. The street (15 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 63%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 26%. The street (15 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $68.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $65.64 | +1.5% | $0.68 | $1,025 | +2.5% |
| 2 months | $54.66 | +21.9% | $0.68 | $1,231 | +23.1% |
| 3 months | $50.84 | +31.1% | $0.68 | $1,324 | +32.4% |
| 6 months | $68.28 | -2.4% | $1.36 | $996 | -0.4% |
| 1 year | $40.82 | +63.2% | $2.70 | $1,699 | +69.9% |
| 2 years | $69.92 | -4.7% | $5.36 | $1,030 | +3.0% |
| 3 years | $103.50 | -35.6% | $7.98 | $721 | -27.9% |
| 5 years | $111.04 | -40.0% | $13.10 | $718 | -28.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever PII does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.