The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 17.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (15 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $94.
Ingersoll Rand IR
Clears both ethical standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Ingersoll Rand Inc.
read at $84.66
Ingersoll Rand holds its Markup at $84.66.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 8 days |
| Price | $84.66 |
| Valuation | 57.20 trailing · 21.98 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 86.2 |
| Beta | 1.17 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $84.51 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 7.60% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as roughly fairly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 7.60% |
| Profit margin | 7.54% |
| Debt to equity | 48.35 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 13 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 26.5% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 15.1% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Ingersoll Rand trades near fair value with thin upside
Picture a reliable supplier of pumps and compressors that keeps factories and hospitals running. Ingersoll Rand sits just 3 percent above our fair value at 82 dollars, offering almost no margin of safety. A 21 times forward multiple on 8 percent revenue growth and a 6 percent return on equity simply does not clear the bar, even though the business passes our ethical screen.
The narrow moat and modest profit margin of 8 percent leave little room for error. Analysts like the name and point to a 92 dollar target, yet our reading of the same numbers says the shares are already priced fairly. We pass.
Cyclical demand in industrial end markets can swing sharply with any slowdown in manufacturing or energy spending. That exposure, combined with limited pricing power, keeps the opportunity rating at avoid. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 22.0x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 57.2x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 7.6% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 7.5% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 5.7% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.48 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 2.23 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.17 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $33.1B |
| Employees | 21,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on IR
- › 3M Gears Up to Report Q2 Earnings: What Lies Ahead for the Stock? Zacks · 17d ago
- › Why Ingersoll Rand Stock Is Soaring Today Barrons.com · 18d ago
- › Alcoa Gears Up to Post Q2 Earnings: What Lies Ahead for the Stock? Zacks · 20d ago
- › Cintas Gears Up to Report Q4 Earnings: Here's What to Expect Zacks · 21d ago
- › Ingersoll Rand (IR) Could Be 15% Undervalued As Earnings Near Simply Wall St. · 23d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in IR's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
IR trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 17%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 15%. The street (15 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $94.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with strong ethical credentials. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-05 | SWANENBURG MICHELLE | Director | 1,876 | · | |
| 2026-04-13 | REYNAL VICENTE | Chief Executive Officer | 30,492 | $2,683,296 | |
| 2026-04-13 | REYNAL VICENTE | Chief Executive Officer | 30,492 | $323,520 | |
| 2026-03-02 | REYNAL VICENTE | Chief Executive Officer | 118,044 | $11,109,121 | |
| 2026-03-02 | REYNAL VICENTE | Chief Executive Officer | 118,044 | $1,252,447 | |
| 2026-02-27 | KINI VIKRAM | Chief Financial Officer | 3,597 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | KEENE KATHLEEN M | Officer | 1,236 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | EMMERICH MATTHEW J | Chief Technology Officer | 643 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | REYNAL VICENTE | Chief Executive Officer | 13,058 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | SCHESKE MICHAEL J | Officer | 1,011 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 May2026 | Dave McCormick | Republican | buy | 500K–1M |
| 6 Apr2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 5 May2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 5 May2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | buy | 500K–1M |
| 4 May2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $74.68 | -5.6% | $0.02 | $944 | -5.6% |
| 2 months | $85.36 | -17.4% | $0.02 | $826 | -17.4% |
| 3 months | $81.15 | -13.1% | $0.02 | $869 | -13.1% |
| 6 months | $83.40 | -15.5% | $0.04 | $846 | -15.4% |
| 1 year | $84.62 | -16.7% | $0.08 | $834 | -16.6% |
| 2 years | $91.02 | -22.6% | $0.16 | $776 | -22.4% |
| 3 years | $62.28 | +13.2% | $0.24 | $1,136 | +13.6% |
| 5 years | $47.68 | +47.8% | $0.38 | $1,486 | +48.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.