The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 7.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 1% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $72.
Astec Industries, Inc. ASTE
Clears the common standard
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Astec Industries, Inc.
read at $55.09
Astec Industries, Inc. holds its Markup at $55.09.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 15 days |
| Price | $55.09 |
| Valuation | 49.19 trailing · 13.09 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 1.34 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 20.30% |
| Profit margin | 1.75% |
| Debt to equity | 57.94 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 4 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 31.0%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Road equipment maker shows thin returns despite growth
Every time a crew paves a highway or crushes rock for new roads the machines come from firms like this one, yet the numbers reveal how little of that activity turns into lasting profit. Revenue is rising 20 percent but margins sit at just 2 percent and return on equity is only 4 percent, leaving the business with limited ability to compound capital even at a forward multiple of 13.1 times. The ethical screen clears, yet the opportunity rating stays at none because the low multiple alone does not signal value in this setting.
Analysts see upside toward 72 dollars from the current 55, and a calculated fair value sits higher still, yet those figures rest on earnings that can swing sharply with public spending cycles. Unknown competitive position and thin returns make it hard to trust that the gap will close rather than widen when orders slow.
Cyclical construction demand often produces exactly this pattern of peak earnings and compressed multiples, creating the appearance of a bargain that later proves expensive once volumes normalise. Currency moves and delayed infrastructure budgets add further uncertainty to any recovery story. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.1x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Trailing P/E | 49.2x expensive — the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| Revenue growth | 20.3% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | 1.7% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 3.9% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 2.34 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 1.34 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $1.3B |
| Employees | 4,468 |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in ASTE's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
ASTE trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 1% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 25%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 29%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $72.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-24 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 15K–50K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 15K–50K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2 Jun2026 | John Curtis | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $52.67 | -4.5% | $0.13 | $958 | -4.2% |
| 2 months | $61.06 | -17.6% | $0.13 | $826 | -17.4% |
| 3 months | $53.56 | -6.1% | $0.13 | $942 | -5.8% |
| 6 months | $46.93 | +7.2% | $0.26 | $1,078 | +7.8% |
| 1 year | $40.10 | +25.5% | $0.52 | $1,268 | +26.8% |
| 2 years | $30.52 | +64.9% | $1.04 | $1,683 | +68.3% |
| 3 years | $41.81 | +20.4% | $1.56 | $1,241 | +24.1% |
| 5 years | $61.71 | -18.5% | $2.54 | $857 | -14.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.