The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 7.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $380.
Willis Towers Watson
WTW · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $29.3B · 47,000 employees
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company operates as an advisory, broking, and solutions company worldwide.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-18 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 4 days ago
Screened 2026-09-18 · the tape above runs as of 11:00 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 309.98 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 363.93, over the last year.
- Trend Distribution
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its distribution label.
Willis Towers Watson holds its Distribution at $309.98. Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 17 days.
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 17 days |
| Price at the screen | $309.98 |
| Valuation | 19.21 trailing · 13.56 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.42 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Business activity screen
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Business activity: Financials sector | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 17% discount to our $363.93 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 9.10% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-18 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 17.4% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 19 covering, consensus None. The average target sits +24% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-18 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsBroker looks cheap yet fails ethics test
Picture a firm that helps multinationals price pensions and insure supply chains across dozens of markets. Willis Towers Watson delivers steady 8 percent revenue growth, a 17 percent profit margin and 21 percent ROE at a forward multiple of 13.2 times. The numbers look workable and the consensus target sits above the current price, yet we pass.
The decision rests on the ethical screen. The business fails the activity test and that single breach overrides any margin of safety or moderate moat. We do not need to debate valuation when the core activity screen already rules the name out.
Risks remain ordinary for the sector: currency moves, regulatory shifts and client concentration. None of those change the ethical outcome. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.6xpriced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 19.2xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 16.14 |
| EPS, forward | 22.86 |
| Revenue growth | +9.1%steady growth |
| Profit margin | 15.5%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 19.8%a solid return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 4.86% |
| Dividend yield | 150.00% |
| Debt to equity | 0.91moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 1.10adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.42barely tracks the market's swings |
| Short interest, float | 0.04% |
| 52-week range | 240.61 - 352.79 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $29.3B |
| Employees | 47,000 |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to United Kingdom and to currency swings.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeWTW trades on a US exchange (the company is based in United Kingdom). As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 28.3% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $332.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 10%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 13%. The street (19 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $332.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- 3 Insurance Stocks Retail Investors Are Watching As War Risk Costs Rise Simply Wall St. · 2d ago
- Willis Towers Watson (WTW) Stock Could Trade At A 34% Discount Following AI Workforce News Simply Wall St. · 5d ago
- BRO Stock Declines 27.1% in a Year: What Should Investors Do Now? Zacks · 6d ago
- WTW Stock Trading at a Discount to Industry at 14.73X: Time to Hold? Zacks · 6d ago
- 5 Dividend Stocks Delivering Rock Solid Fourth-Quarter Income 24/7 Wall St. · 6d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | CLARKE LUCY | Officer | 1,896 | $499,340 | |
| 2026-05-04 | HESS CARL AARON | Chief Executive Officer | 2,000 | $510,160 | |
| 2026-04-20 | GEBAUER JULIE JARECKE | Officer | 1,819 | · | |
| 2026-04-20 | HESS CARL AARON | Chief Executive Officer | 8,429 | · | |
| 2026-04-20 | KRASNER ANDREW JAY | Chief Financial Officer | 2,360 | · | |
| 2026-04-20 | QURESHI IMRAN AHMED | Officer | 1,053 | · | |
| 2026-04-20 | KURPIS JOSEPH STEPHEN | Officer | 96 | · | |
| 2026-04-20 | BANAS KRISTY D | Officer | 770 | · | |
| 2026-04-20 | FABER ALEXIS | Chief Operating Officer | 848 | · | |
| 2026-04-20 | FURMAN MATTHEW | General Counsel | 913 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $249.72 | +5.7% | · | $1,057 | +5.7% |
| 2 months | $280.14 | -5.8% | · | $942 | -5.8% |
| 3 months | $285.68 | -7.6% | $0.96 | $927 | -7.3% |
| 6 months | $323.61 | -18.5% | $1.88 | $821 | -17.9% |
| 1 year | $293.35 | -10.0% | $3.72 | $912 | -8.8% |
| 2 years | $249.64 | +5.7% | $7.28 | $1,086 | +8.6% |
| 3 years | $217.28 | +21.5% | $10.68 | $1,264 | +26.4% |
| 5 years | $241.67 | +9.2% | $16.40 | $1,160 | +16.0% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever WTW does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.