The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 1.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (18 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $23.
Campbell's Company (The) CPB
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · The Campbell's Company, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets food and beverage products in the United States and internationally.
read at $21.98
Campbell's Company (The) holds its Markup at $21.98.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days |
| Price | $21.98 |
| Valuation | 10.77 trailing · 11.29 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.00 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $18.76 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | -4.40% |
| Profit margin | 6.12% |
| Debt to equity | 182.04 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 17 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 48.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 4.5% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.2% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Campbell's Soup Sells Less While Debt Mounts
Picture the red and white can that once sat in every kitchen cupboard. Campbell's still shifts tins and snacks, yet revenue is falling 4% and the balance sheet carries more debt than our ethical screen will accept, so we pass.
The 11 times forward earnings multiple looks modest against 15% ROE and a narrow moat, but the price sits 14% above our fair value and seventeen analysts see only modest upside to 20 dollars. Defensive food names rarely reward investors who ignore the top line.
Heavy leverage that fails the debt test plus shrinking sales turn the low multiple into a warning rather than an opportunity. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 11.3x reasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 10.8x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | -4.4% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 6.1% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 15.4% a solid return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.82 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.87 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.00 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $6.6B |
| Employees | 13,700 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in CPB's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
CPB trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are down 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 6%. The street (18 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $23.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-30 | HILL GRANT H. | Director | 3,224 | · | |
| 2026-03-30 | DORRANCE BENNETT JR. | Director | 1,925 | · | |
| 2026-03-30 | MALONE MARY ALICE DORRANCE JR | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 1,882 | · | |
| 2026-03-30 | ARREDONDO FABIOLA R | Director | 1,925 | · | |
| 2026-03-30 | VAN BEUREN ARCHBOLD D | Director | 2,037 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | ANAND MOHIT | Officer | 21,505 | · | |
| 2026-01-09 | SANZIO ANTHONY | Officer | 2,700 | $71,578 | |
| 2025-12-30 | BRAWLEY CHARLES A. III | General Counsel | 11,550 | $325,075 | |
| 2025-12-29 | HILL GRANT H. | Director | 2,540 | · | |
| 2025-12-29 | DORRANCE BENNETT JR. | Director | 1,516 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 | Bill Keating | Democrat | Sale | 15K–50K |
| 15 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $20.63 | +11.8% | · | $1,118 | +11.8% |
| 2 months | $20.43 | +12.9% | · | $1,129 | +12.9% |
| 3 months | $21.27 | +8.4% | $0.39 | $1,103 | +10.3% |
| 6 months | $27.52 | -16.2% | $0.78 | $866 | -13.4% |
| 1 year | $32.18 | -28.3% | $1.56 | $765 | -23.5% |
| 2 years | $38.72 | -40.4% | $3.08 | $675 | -32.5% |
| 3 years | $40.59 | -43.2% | $4.56 | $681 | -31.9% |
| 5 years | $38.18 | -39.6% | $7.52 | $801 | -19.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.