The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 11%. The street (5 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $2005.
Markel Group Inc MKL
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Markel Group Inc.
read at $2,039.35
Markel Group Inc holds its Markup at $2,039.35.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 22 days |
| Price | $2,039.35 |
| Valuation | 14.58 trailing · 17.44 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 0.66 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | -16.90% |
| Profit margin | 11.07% |
| Debt to equity | 23.50 |
| Analyst consensus | None · 6 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its excluded industry: insurance - property & casualty. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Excluded industry: Insurance - Property & Casualty Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Why this insurer fails at the first gate
Picture a policyholder filing a claim after a storm and the payout moving through layers of capital that insurers gather from premiums. Markel sits squarely in that chain yet we pass without hesitation because the business lands in an excluded industry. The ethical screen exists for this reason and leaves no room for debate.
Numbers reinforce the decision. Revenue fell 17 percent, the forward multiple sits at 16.9 times while shares trade 23 percent above our fair value, and return on equity is just 10 percent with only a narrow moat. Analyst targets cluster near the current price but offer no margin of safety.
Cyclical insurance results can swing sharply with claims and investment returns, so the modest profitability shown here may not hold when losses rise. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 17.4x reasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 14.6x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | -16.9% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 11.1% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 10.0% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.24 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 3.22 comfortably covers its short-term bills |
| Beta | 0.66 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $25.5B |
| Employees | 22,900 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on MKL
- › Willis (WTW) Expands CyMax Cyber Insurance Facility for EMEA Middle-Market Clients Insider Monkey · 27d ago
- › Is Markel Group Inc. (MKL) A Good Stock To Buy Now? Insider Monkey · 29d ago
- › How Index Removal and Investment Losses Will Impact Markel Group’s (MKL) Insurance‑Led Investment Narrative Simply Wall St. · 30d ago
- › Markel Group (MKL) Was Dropped From Several Russell Growth Indexes At Once Simply Wall St. · 2 Jul 2026
- › Q1 Rundown: Markel Group (NYSE:MKL) Vs Other Property & Casualty Insurance Stocks StockStory · 1 Jul 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in MKL's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $1,838.77 | -1.2% | · | $988 | -1.2% |
| 2 months | $1,924.82 | -5.6% | · | $944 | -5.6% |
| 3 months | $1,947.67 | -6.7% | · | $933 | -6.7% |
| 6 months | $2,125.83 | -14.5% | · | $855 | -14.5% |
| 1 year | $1,926.62 | -5.7% | · | $943 | -5.7% |
| 2 years | $1,579.70 | +15.0% | · | $1,150 | +15.0% |
| 3 years | $1,342.27 | +35.4% | · | $1,354 | +35.4% |
| 5 years | $1,205.79 | +50.7% | · | $1,507 | +50.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.