The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 29.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 31%. The street (3 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $12.
Webull Corporation BULL
Outside both standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
read at $7.23
Webull Corporation holds its Markup at $7.23.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 277 days |
| Price | $7.23 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 23.70 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 0.55 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 45% discount to our $10.46 fair value, weak competitive moat, 36.30% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 36.30% |
| Profit margin | -1.65% |
| Debt to equity | 7.51 |
| Analyst consensus | Strong Buy · 3 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its business activity: leveraged / inverse / derivative instrument (gharar). Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business involves an activity the values screen does not clear. Fail
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 2.1% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are 58.3% of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Webull chases traders yet fails basic checks
Picture a trading app that pulls in users fast across borders. Revenue climbs 36 percent, yet the firm still posts a 2 percent loss margin and negative 1 percent return on equity, with a weak moat protecting nothing durable. The ethical screen flags a failed cash ratio, so we pass regardless of the 45 percent gap between the 7.23 price and our 10.46 fair value.
Forward earnings sit at 23.7 times while three analysts still push a 13 target and a strong buy call. That optimism ignores the missing profits and thin competitive edge that leave little room for error once growth slows.
Risk sits in the cash shortfall and thin margins that could turn any slowdown into deeper losses. The market loves the story, yet the numbers and ethics point the other way. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 23.7x cheap for a company growing this fast |
| Revenue growth | 36.3% strong top-line growth |
| Profit margin | -1.7% currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -1.3% not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 0.08 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.28 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.55 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $3.8B |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in BULL's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
BULL trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are down 42%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 31%. The street (3 analysts) rates it strong buy, with a mean price target of $12.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-10 | HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Director | 4,719 | · | |
| 2026-04-10 | HOULIHAN WILLIAM A | Director | 12,500 | · | |
| 2025-04-10 | BOEHNER JOHN ANDREW | Director | 40,000 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $7.07 | -11.6% | · | $884 | -11.6% |
| 2 months | $4.93 | +26.8% | · | $1,268 | +26.8% |
| 3 months | $5.29 | +18.2% | · | $1,182 | +18.2% |
| 6 months | $9.73 | -35.8% | · | $643 | -35.8% |
| 1 year | $10.85 | -42.4% | · | $576 | -42.4% |
| 2 years | $11.10 | -43.7% | · | $563 | -43.7% |
| 3 years | $10.56 | -40.8% | · | $592 | -40.8% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.