The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 1%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 16%. The street (3 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $87.
Strategic Education, Inc. STRA
Clears both ethical standards
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Strategic Education, Inc.
read at $76.53
Strategic Education, Inc. holds its Markup at $76.53.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 4 days |
| Price | $76.53 |
| Valuation | 13.55 trailing · 9.46 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.50 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 0.80% |
| Profit margin | 10.21% |
| Debt to equity | 6.68 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 3 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company clears both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Education firm looks cheap but growth has stalled
Picture a university campus where enrolment barely moves year to year while costs keep climbing. Strategic Education runs post-secondary courses across the US, Australia and New Zealand plus online skills programmes, yet revenue is expanding only 1 percent and return on equity sits at 8 percent. At 9.5 times forward earnings the shares sit well below our fair value of 95 dollars, but the opportunity rating stays at none because the business simply is not compounding.
The low multiple reflects that reality rather than a bargain. Profit margins of 10 percent are steady and the ethical screen clears, yet single-digit growth and an unknown moat leave little room for meaningful upside from here. Analyst targets cluster around 91 dollars, which still implies limited excitement once the numbers are stress-tested against flat demand for traditional degrees.
Risk centres on further enrolment weakness if employers shift toward shorter credentials and on currency moves in the Australia and New Zealand segment. Unknown competitive defences add another layer of uncertainty in a market already facing regulatory and demographic pressure. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 9.5x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 13.5x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 0.8% slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 10.2% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 7.9% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.07 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.16 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.50 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $1.7B |
| Employees | 3,683 |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in STRA's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
STRA trades on Nasdaq. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 15K–50K |
| 4 May2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | sell | 100K–250K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 15 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $77.02 | +5.8% | $0.60 | $1,066 | +6.6% |
| 2 months | $80.57 | +1.2% | $0.60 | $1,019 | +1.9% |
| 3 months | $78.58 | +3.8% | $0.60 | $1,045 | +4.5% |
| 6 months | $79.76 | +2.2% | $1.20 | $1,037 | +3.7% |
| 1 year | $80.52 | +1.2% | $2.40 | $1,042 | +4.2% |
| 2 years | $104.42 | -21.9% | $4.80 | $827 | -17.3% |
| 3 years | $70.14 | +16.2% | $7.20 | $1,265 | +26.5% |
| 5 years | $68.34 | +19.3% | $12.00 | $1,369 | +36.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.