The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 6.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (19 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $102.
Southern Company
SO · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $96.4B · 29,502 employees
The Southern Company, through its subsidiaries, engages in the sale of electricity.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-18 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 4 days ago
Screened 2026-09-18 · the tape above runs as of 11:00 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 85.52 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 87.43, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Southern Company holds its Markdown at $85.52. The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 2 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 2 days |
| Price at the screen | $85.52 |
| Valuation | 20.61 trailing · 17.37 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.32 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 47.57% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 47.6% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 2.74% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 2.7% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 2.50% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 2.5% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 2% discount to our $87.43 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 0.10% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-18 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 2.2% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 19 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +18% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as roughly fairly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-18 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsReliable Power Bills Mask Heavy Debt Load
Millions of homes count on steady electricity every month, yet the balance sheet behind that reliability carries more debt than our ethical screen allows. Southern Company sits above our fair value estimate with a forward P/E of 19.4 times and a clear fail on debt metrics.
We pass because the current price leaves no margin of safety and the debt burden trips our core ethical test. Revenue growth at 8 percent and a 14 percent profit margin look respectable on paper, but they do not offset the valuation gap or the leverage concern.
The moderate moat in regulated power offers some protection, yet high debt still raises questions about resilience if rates or costs shift. Nineteen analysts call it a hold with a higher median target, but that does not change our reading.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 17.4xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 20.6xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 4.15 |
| EPS, forward | 4.92 |
| Revenue growth | +0.1%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 15.4%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 11.5%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | -3.82% |
| Dividend yield | 331.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.82a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.79below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.32barely tracks the market's swings |
| Short interest, float | 0.03% |
| 52-week range | 83.80 - 100.84 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $96.4B |
| Employees | 29,502 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeSO trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (19 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $102. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (19 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $102. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (19 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $102. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (19 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $102. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 2.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (19 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $102. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (19 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $102. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 2.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (19 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $102. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 3% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 9%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (19 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $102.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- High-Yield Dividend Stocks Throw Off Serious Income. Where You Hold Them Matters 24/7 Wall St. · 3d ago
- Academy Sports (ASO) Is Up 12.8% After Earnings Beat, Higher EPS Outlook And Hoka Rollout Simply Wall St. · 6d ago
- Is PG&E Stock Cheap, Or Just Waiting On California? Trefis · 6d ago
- Southern Co. (SO) Falls More Steeply Than Broader Market: What Investors Need to Know Zacks · 7d ago
- Co-op could face full-scale probe into Southern Co-op deal over competition fears PA Media: Money · 7d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | KIM MATTHEW M. | Officer | 100 | $9,657 | |
| 2026-04-01 | KIM MATTHEW M. | Officer | 82 | · | |
| 2026-03-30 | GREENE KIMBERLY S | Officer | 25,000 | $2,416,750 | |
| 2026-03-19 | CUMMISKEY CHRISTOPHER | Officer | 6,669 | $643,892 | |
| 2026-03-18 | CONNALLY STANLEY W JR | Chief Operating Officer | 12,500 | $1,214,125 | |
| 2026-03-06 | DRAKE SLOANE N | Officer | 1,420 | · | |
| 2026-02-26 | EARLEY ANTHONY F JR | Director | 15,000 | · | |
| 2026-02-24 | KIM MATTHEW M. | Officer | 5,123 | $487,453 | |
| 2026-02-13 | WOMACK CHRISTOPHER C. | Chief Executive Officer | 179,550 | · | |
| 2026-02-13 | WOMACK CHRISTOPHER C. | Chief Executive Officer | 13,751 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-27 | Thomas Kean Jr | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-27 | Thomas Kean Jr | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-27 | Thomas Kean Jr | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-27 | Thomas Kean Jr | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2026-08-26 | David Taylor | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $92.34 | +1.8% | $0.76 | $1,026 | +2.6% |
| 2 months | $96.35 | -2.4% | $0.76 | $984 | -1.6% |
| 3 months | $97.04 | -3.1% | $0.76 | $977 | -2.3% |
| 6 months | $83.38 | +12.8% | $1.50 | $1,146 | +14.6% |
| 1 year | $86.47 | +8.7% | $2.98 | $1,122 | +12.2% |
| 2 years | $73.96 | +27.1% | $5.88 | $1,351 | +35.1% |
| 3 years | $64.13 | +46.6% | $8.70 | $1,602 | +60.2% |
| 5 years | $53.09 | +77.1% | $14.10 | $2,037 | +103.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever SO does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.