The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 6.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139.
Duke Energy
DUK · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $91.0B · 26,441 employees
Duke Energy Corporation, through its subsidiaries, operates as an energy company in the United States.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-21 · not a live quote
Screened 2026-09-21 · the tape above runs as of 09:00 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 116.74 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 117.06, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Duke Energy holds its Markdown at $116.74. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 7 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 7 days |
| Price at the screen | $116.74 |
| Valuation | 17.58 trailing · 16.28 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.36 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 46.42% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 46.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 6.58% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 6.6% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 2.29% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 2.3% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.16% | Below 5% | Only 0.2% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 0% discount to our $117.06 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 1.10% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-21 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 0.3% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 18 covering, consensus None. The average target sits +17% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as roughly fairly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-21 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsToo much debt sinks this utility stock
Power reaches every home yet Duke Energy trades above our fair value with a negative margin of safety. The ethical screen fails on its debt ratio, and that alone rules it out for us regardless of the regulated cash flows.
Revenue growth sits at 11 percent with a 16 percent profit margin and 10 percent ROE, yet the forward multiple of 17.4 times leaves little room for error. A narrow moat and regulated status offer stability, but the balance sheet leverage overrides those comforts.
Analysts like the name and point to a $138 target, yet high debt in a rising rate world creates real downside. We pass. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 16.3xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 17.6xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 6.64 |
| EPS, forward | 7.17 |
| Revenue growth | +1.1%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 16.0%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 9.9%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | -4.74% |
| Dividend yield | 343.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.62a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.66below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.36barely tracks the market's swings |
| Short interest, float | 0.03% |
| 52-week range | 113.90 - 134.49 |
| Moat | NARROW |
| Market cap | $91.0B |
| Employees | 26,441 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeDUK trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 5.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 12%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 8%. The street (18 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $139.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- How Investors May Respond To Duke Energy (DUK) Winning an Emergency Recovery Award for Storm Resilience Simply Wall St. · 3d ago
- Is PG&E Stock Cheap, Or Just Waiting On California? Trefis · 6d ago
- Here's Why Duke Energy (DUK) Fell More Than Broader Market Zacks · 7d ago
- Can Kentucky's Economic Development Drive PPL's Long-Term Growth? Zacks · 8d ago
- How Much Does a 61-Year-Old Need Invested to Collect $8,600 a Month for Life? 24/7 Wall St. · 9d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | RENJEL LOUIS E | Officer | 3,500 | $438,025 | |
| 2026-05-08 | SIDERIS HARRY K. | Chief Executive Officer | 20,000 | $2,487,400 | |
| 2026-05-07 | FANANDAKIS NICHOLAS C | Director | 1,602 | $200,042 | |
| 2026-05-07 | HERRON JOHN T | Director | 1,602 | $200,042 | |
| 2026-05-07 | DAVIS ROBERT M | Director | 1,602 | $200,042 | |
| 2026-05-07 | CRAVER THEODORE F JR | Chairman of the Board | 2,402 | $299,938 | |
| 2026-03-02 | GHARTEY-TAGOE KODWO | Officer | 18,246 | $2,400,653 | |
| 2026-03-02 | REPKO REGIS T | Officer | 663 | $86,853 | |
| 2026-02-26 | SIDERIS HARRY K. | Chief Executive Officer | 30,540 | · | |
| 2026-02-25 | SAVOY BRIAN D. | Chief Financial Officer | 7,679 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-15 | Tommy Tuberville | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| 2025-04-15 | Tommy Tuberville | Republican | sell | 15K–50K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $123.83 | +1.2% | $1.07 | $1,021 | +2.1% |
| 2 months | $130.66 | -4.1% | $1.07 | $967 | -3.3% |
| 3 months | $130.69 | -4.1% | $1.07 | $967 | -3.3% |
| 6 months | $112.45 | +11.5% | $2.13 | $1,133 | +13.3% |
| 1 year | $112.40 | +11.5% | $4.26 | $1,153 | +15.3% |
| 2 years | $95.46 | +31.3% | $8.44 | $1,401 | +40.1% |
| 3 years | $81.55 | +53.7% | $12.54 | $1,691 | +69.1% |
| 5 years | $84.03 | +49.2% | $20.50 | $1,735 | +73.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever DUK does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.