The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
TWO · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $1.3B · 486 employees
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 27 Oct 2026Daily close, not a live quoteLast reviewed 9 days ago
Screened 2026-10-27 · the tape above runs as of 12:01 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price12.18 USD at the 27 Oct 2026 close
- Our value readFair vs our fair value, as of 27 Oct 2026
- Our regime readMarkdown, as of 1 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- Last reviewed27 Oct 2026 (9 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $11.82 to $19.70, base estimate $12.12 (screen dated 2026-10-27).
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Two Harbors Investment Corp. holds its Markdown at $12.18. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 47 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 47 days |
| Price at the screen | $12.18 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 10.34 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 30.0 |
| Beta | 1.05 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: mortgage
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Excluded | Core business clean | Prohibited keyword in sector/industry: mortgage | Fail |
| Debt load | Excluded | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | Excluded | Below 33% | Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. | Fail |
| Receivables | Excluded | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. | Fail |
| Revenue purity | Excluded | Below 5% | of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. | Fail |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Two Harbors Investment does not clear the screen at the business-activity stage. It operates in an area the screen excludes: mortgage, so the financial ratios are not the deciding factor here.
Read as at 2026-11-05. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when TWO's ethical verdict changes
Today TWO does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Fair vs our fair value, as of 27 Oct 2026: it trades above our $12.12 fair value estimate, 620.20% revenue growth.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-10-27 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 0.5% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets. The average target sits −1% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our model and the Street both land near the screened price: fairly valued, with no strong edge either way.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $12.12, with a range of $11.82 to $19.70, dated to the 2026-10-27 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsMortgage REITs Hide Losses Behind Ethical Red Lines
Every time a household signs a mortgage the cash flows get sliced and repackaged into securities that carry real social weight. Two Harbors sits in the middle of that chain, yet it fails our ethical screen outright because the mortgage sector itself is off limits. The numbers do not rescue the case either. Revenue has jumped but profit margins sit at minus 69 percent and return on equity is minus 18 percent, so the low forward multiple of 10.3 times looks more like a warning than a bargain.
We pass for two clear reasons. The ethical block is non negotiable and the business shows no durable edge, with an unknown moat and an analyst consensus that simply says hold at a price matching the current level. Even the thin margin of safety to our fair value does not change the picture once the sector screen is applied.
Cyclical mortgage exposure adds another layer of risk, where earnings can swing sharply with interest rates and housing turnover. Peak cycle multiples often look cheap right before they compress further. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 10.3xcheap for a company growing this fast |
| EPS, trailing | -0.72 |
| EPS, forward | 0.99 |
| Revenue growth | +620.2%growing very fast |
| Profit margin | -3.4%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -1.2%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Dividend yield | 1,143.00% |
| Debt to equity | 3.79heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 0.22below 1: short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 1.05moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.06% |
| 52-week range | 8.78 - 14.17 |
| Market cap | $1.3B |
| Employees | 486 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeTWO trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 14% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11.
Our analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 28%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 23%. The street (4 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $11.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Two Harbors Investment (TWO) Stock Looks Pricey On Sales Alone Yahoo Finance · 16d ago
- Is Fee Lawsuit Altering The Investment Case For Two Harbors Investment (TWO)? Yahoo Finance · 18d ago
- TWO Announces Intention to Voluntarily Delist and Deregister 9.375% Senior Notes due 2030 from the New York Stock Exchange Yahoo Finance · 14 Sep 2026
- TWO Announces Offer to Repurchase 9.375% Senior Notes due 2030 and Satisfaction and Discharge of the Related Indenture Yahoo Finance · 11 Sep 2026
- TWO Announces Redemption of Series A, Series B and Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock Yahoo Finance · 28 Aug 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-24 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-24 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-24 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-24 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-24 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $12.62 | -2.3% | · | $977 | -2.3% |
| 2 months | $11.02 | +11.9% | · | $1,119 | +11.9% |
| 3 months | $8.93 | +38.0% | $0.34 | $1,418 | +41.8% |
| 6 months | $9.39 | +31.3% | $0.68 | $1,386 | +38.6% |
| 1 year | $9.62 | +28.2% | $1.41 | $1,429 | +42.9% |
| 2 years | $9.86 | +25.1% | $3.21 | $1,576 | +57.6% |
| 3 years | $9.03 | +36.5% | $5.01 | $1,920 | +92.0% |
| 5 years | $15.26 | -19.2% | $10.29 | $1,482 | +48.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever TWO does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.