The framework has shifted from markdown to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 11.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 74%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $17.
Kohl's Corporation KSS
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
read at $20.10
Kohl's Corporation holds its Accumulation at $20.10.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Accumulation label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days |
| Price | $20.10 |
| Valuation | 8.45 trailing · 13.56 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 1.42 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the Street see limited upside at this price.
| Revenue growth | -2.00% |
| Profit margin | 1.77% |
| Debt to equity | 162.35 |
| Analyst consensus | None · 13 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 456.8% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are 46.4% of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
A retailer losing shoppers and drowning in debt
Walk past any high street these days and the empty storefronts tell their own story. Revenue here is already sliding 2 percent, profit margins sit at just 2 percent, and returns on equity are a thin 7 percent with no meaningful edge to protect the business.
We pass on this one for clear reasons. The balance sheet fails our ethical screen on debt, the moat is weak, and the shares trade at a 27 percent premium to our fair value of 14.67 despite a forward multiple of 13.6 times and analyst targets clustered around 16.
The real danger is that low multiples on a declining cyclical business often signal peak earnings rather than a bargain, leaving holders exposed if consumer spending keeps softening. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.6x reasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 8.4x very cheap relative to earnings |
| Revenue growth | -2.0% revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 1.8% barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 7.0% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.62 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.48 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.42 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $2.3B |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in KSS's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
KSS trades on the NYSE. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B. Technically it is momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 74%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 28%. The street (12 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $17.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $13.09 | +20.6% | · | $1,206 | +20.6% |
| 2 months | $13.28 | +18.9% | · | $1,189 | +18.9% |
| 3 months | $13.14 | +20.2% | $0.13 | $1,211 | +21.1% |
| 6 months | $23.66 | -33.3% | $0.13 | $672 | -32.8% |
| 1 year | $9.07 | +74.2% | $0.50 | $1,797 | +79.7% |
| 2 years | $20.15 | -21.6% | $2.13 | $889 | -11.1% |
| 3 years | $18.22 | -13.4% | $3.63 | $1,065 | +6.5% |
| 5 years | $40.52 | -61.0% | $7.13 | $566 | -43.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.