The framework has shifted from markup to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 5.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 7%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (13 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $94.
Solventum
SOLV · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $14.9B · 20,584 employees
Solventum Corporation, a healthcare company, develops, manufactures, and commercializes a portfolio of solutions to address critical customer and patient needs in the United States and internationally.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-10
Screened 2026-09-10 · the tape above runs as of 23:00 UTC · 20 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 87.65 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 81.97, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against today's price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Solventum holds its Markdown at $87.65. The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 27 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 27 days |
| Price at the screen | $87.65 |
| Valuation | 10.72 trailing · 12.13 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.69 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 35.22% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 35.2% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 13.38% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 13.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades above our $81.97 fair value estimate, moderate competitive moat, 2.20% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-10 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 6.5% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 13 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +8% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-10 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsSolventum fails debt test despite solid margins
Picture a hospital supplier whose kits keep operations running, yet the balance sheet carries more debt than the business can comfortably carry. We pass on Solventum because the shares sit 8 percent above our fair value and the ethical screen flags excessive leverage straight away.
Revenue is already shrinking 3 percent, the forward multiple of 11.5 times offers little cushion for that decline, and the 35 percent return on equity looks less impressive once the debt load is considered. A moderate moat and 17 percent profit margin do not offset the valuation gap or the red flag on the balance sheet.
Thirteen analysts may still lean buy with an 85 dollar median target, yet that consensus ignores both the cyclical pressure on healthcare spending and the leverage that tripped our screen. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 12.1xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 10.7xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 8.18 |
| EPS, forward | 7.23 |
| Revenue growth | +2.2%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 17.3%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 34.0%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 3.28% |
| Debt to equity | 1.10a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.02adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.69steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.02% |
| 52-week range | 62.38 - 94.16 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $14.9B |
| Employees | 20,584 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeSOLV trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from accumulation to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 2.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 7%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (13 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $82.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 7%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 21%. The street (13 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $82.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | HARRINGTON PAUL S | Officer | 3,960 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | MCMILLAN WAYDE D | Chief Financial Officer | 9,503 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | HANSON BRYAN CRAIG | Chief Executive Officer | 34,315 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | KIRBERGER MARCELA A. | Officer | 4,488 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | GOMEZ TAMMY L | Officer | 3,960 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | LANDUCCI AMY | Chief Technology Officer | 4,422 | · | |
| 2026-05-13 | WILCOX MARY T | Officer | 2,376 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | WENDELL AMY MCBRIDE | Director | 3,403 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | WILSON DARRYL L | Director | 3,403 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | MILY ELIZABETH | Director | 3,403 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2026-03-27 | Alan Armstrong | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2024-05-03 | Tommy Tuberville | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $74.12 | +9.2% | · | $1,092 | +9.2% |
| 2 months | $65.79 | +23.0% | · | $1,230 | +23.0% |
| 3 months | $66.12 | +22.4% | · | $1,224 | +22.4% |
| 6 months | $82.79 | -2.2% | · | $978 | -2.2% |
| 1 year | $75.55 | +7.1% | · | $1,071 | +7.1% |
| 2 years | $56.71 | +42.7% | · | $1,427 | +42.7% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever SOLV does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.