The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 19.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 35%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (13 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $22.
Baxter International
BAX · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $12.5B · 37,500 employees
Baxter International Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides a portfolio of healthcare products in the United States.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-10
Screened 2026-09-10 · the tape above runs as of 23:00 UTC · 20 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 24.18 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 25.92, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against today's price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Baxter International holds its Markdown at $24.18. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 14 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 14 days |
| Price at the screen | $24.18 |
| Valuation | N/A trailing · 11.87 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.60 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 48.77% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 48.8% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.51% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.5% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 19.08% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 19.1% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.46% | Below 5% | Only 0.5% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 7% discount to our $25.92 fair value, weak competitive moat, 5.30% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-10 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 7.2% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 11 covering, consensus None. The average target sits +16% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-10 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsMedical supplier weighed down by heavy debt
Hospitals depend on steady flows of sterile bags and therapies, yet Baxter keeps borrowing more than its operations can comfortably carry. We pass because the ethical screen rejects the debt load outright, and the business shows no sign of the growth or returns needed to justify the price above our fair value.
Forward earnings sit at 11.3 times while revenue edges up just 3 percent and both profit margin and return on equity sit deep in negative territory. A weak moat leaves it exposed to competitors that move faster on innovation and pricing.
Analysts sit on hold with targets near current levels, but the real concern remains leverage that could tighten further if healthcare spending slows. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 11.9xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| EPS, trailing | -1.88 |
| EPS, forward | 2.04 |
| Revenue growth | +5.3%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | -9.3%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -14.4%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| FCF yield | 8.00% |
| Dividend yield | 111.00% |
| Debt to equity | 1.56a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.95healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 0.60steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.07% |
| 52-week range | 15.73 - 30.00 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $12.5B |
| Employees | 37,500 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeBAX trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 16.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 35%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (13 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $22.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are down 35%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 17%. The street (13 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $22.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-05 | MCDONNELL MICHAEL R | Director | 12,836 | · | |
| 2026-05-05 | WILKES DAVID S. M.D. | Director | 12,836 | · | |
| 2026-05-05 | AMPOFO WILLIAM A. II | Director | 12,836 | · | |
| 2026-05-05 | WENDELL AMY MCBRIDE | Director | 12,836 | · | |
| 2026-05-05 | SHAFER DAVID BRENT | Chairman of the Board | 12,836 | · | |
| 2026-05-05 | SCHLICHTING NANCY M | Director | 12,836 | · | |
| 2026-05-05 | CRAIG JEFFREY A | Director | 12,836 | · | |
| 2026-05-05 | MORRISON PATRICIA B | Director | 12,836 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | ROSENBLOOM DAVID S | General Counsel | 26,709 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | HIDER ANDREW P | Chief Executive Officer | 201,804 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-05-01 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Sale | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $17.52 | +16.4% | $0.01 | $1,165 | +16.5% |
| 2 months | $17.14 | +19.0% | $0.01 | $1,190 | +19.0% |
| 3 months | $18.00 | +13.3% | $0.01 | $1,134 | +13.4% |
| 6 months | $18.88 | +8.0% | $0.02 | $1,081 | +8.1% |
| 1 year | $31.45 | -35.2% | $0.20 | $655 | -34.5% |
| 2 years | $31.86 | -36.0% | $1.00 | $671 | -32.9% |
| 3 years | $39.43 | -48.3% | $2.16 | $572 | -42.8% |
| 5 years | $74.32 | -72.6% | $4.45 | $334 | -66.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever BAX does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.