The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 9.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (10 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $17.
Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
DRVN · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $2.0B
FAIL · Does not pass the screenScreen close, 2026-09-24 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 13 days ago
Screened 2026-09-24 · the tape above runs as of 11:02 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 12.04 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 19.38, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
Driven Brands Holdings Inc. holds its Markdown at $12.04. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 14 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 14 days |
| Price at the screen | $12.04 |
| Valuation | 12.16 trailing · 8.38 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL |
| Beta | 0.95 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 117.66% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 117.7% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 6.92% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 6.9% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 0.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
Driven Brands's business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 118% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-10-07. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 61% discount to our $19.38 fair value, weak competitive moat, 6.80% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-24 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 60.9% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 12 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +29% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-24 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsCar Repairs Look Everyday But Debt Weighs Heavy
Picture the local garage chain that fixes your brakes or oils your engine every few months. Driven Brands sits behind many of those familiar names yet carries a debt load that already fails our ethical screen. That single red flag rules it out before any valuation debate begins.
The business shows an 8% revenue growth rate, 10% profit margins and 20% ROE, with shares trading at a forward multiple of 10.2x against a calculated fair value 40% higher. Still the moat is weak and ten analysts see little more than modest upside to $17. Low growth plus thin competitive protection leaves the cheap multiple looking more like a warning than an opportunity.
Cyclical consumer spending can turn quickly, and high leverage amplifies any slowdown in traffic through those workshops. We pass for the ethical breach on debt and the absence of durable advantages. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 8.4xpriced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 12.2xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 0.99 |
| EPS, forward | 1.44 |
| Revenue growth | +6.8%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 8.6%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 20.7%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 13.47% |
| Debt to equity | 2.66heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.47adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.95steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.15% |
| 52-week range | 9.80 - 17.30 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $2.0B |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeDRVN trades on Nasdaq. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from markup to distribution since the last review. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 13.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (10 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $17.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 17.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (10 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $17.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 27%. The street (10 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $17.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- DRVN or GPC: Which Is the Better Value Stock Right Now? Zacks · 23d ago
- Should ADW Capital’s Activist Sale Push and Governance Critique Require Action From Driven Brands (DRVN) Investors? Simply Wall St. · 17 Aug 2026
- Is Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) Undervalued After Rejecting A $18 Per Share Offer? Simply Wall St. · 16 Aug 2026
- Driven Brands (DRVN) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript Motley Fool · 13 Aug 2026
- Driven Brands Sees Low-Income Consumer Weakness, Likely Keeping Investors on Sidelines, RBC Says MT Newswires · 7 Aug 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | O'MELIA SCOTT L | Officer | 46,875 | $750,000 | |
| 2025-09-15 | FITZPATRICK JONATHAN G | Director | 185,000 | $3,355,750 | |
| 2025-05-09 | RIVERA DANIEL R. | Chief Executive Officer | 71,692 | · | |
| 2025-05-09 | FITZPATRICK JONATHAN G | Director | 11,627 | · | |
| 2025-05-09 | FONDELL REBECCA | Officer | 29,067 | · | |
| 2025-03-13 | PUCKETT RICHARD DAVID | Director | 8,809 | · | |
| 2025-03-13 | SWINBURN PETER S | Director | 8,809 | · | |
| 2025-03-13 | HALLIGAN CATHERINE ANN | Director | 8,809 | · | |
| 2025-03-13 | TOMAS JOSE D. | Director | 8,809 | · | |
| 2025-03-13 | DIAMOND MICHAEL FISHER | Chief Financial Officer | 35,436 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $13.25 | +3.2% | · | $1,032 | +3.2% |
| 2 months | $12.36 | +10.6% | · | $1,106 | +10.6% |
| 3 months | $10.48 | +30.4% | · | $1,304 | +30.4% |
| 6 months | $15.51 | -11.9% | · | $881 | -11.9% |
| 1 year | $17.82 | -23.3% | · | $767 | -23.3% |
| 2 years | $11.02 | +24.1% | · | $1,241 | +24.1% |
| 3 years | $26.89 | -49.2% | · | $508 | -49.2% |
| 5 years | $29.83 | -54.2% | · | $458 | -54.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever DRVN does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.