The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 38%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $151.
Prologis PLD
Clears the common standard
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Prologis, Inc.
read at $147.63
Prologis holds its Markup at $147.63.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days |
| Price | $147.63 |
| Valuation | 32.95 trailing · 43.39 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.34 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades above our $107.47 fair value estimate, narrow competitive moat, 12.30% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 12.30% |
| Profit margin | 43.58% |
| Debt to equity | 62.70 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 14 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 36.1% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 25.1%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 11.2% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 1.8% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Warehouses Booming Yet Debt and Price Block the Way
Picture goods flowing through endless logistics parks. Prologis owns a big slice of that network yet charges investors 44 times forward earnings for revenue growth of just 6 percent a year.
We pass because the shares sit 50 percent above our fair value and the ethical screen flags too much debt. Profit margins of 44 percent look solid but return on equity is only 8 percent and the moat stays narrow.
Wall Street still calls it a buy with a 158 dollar target yet that ignores leverage risk in a sector where earnings can peak fast. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 43.4x expensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 33.0x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 12.3% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 43.6% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 7.7% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.63 moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 0.30 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 1.34 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $140.9B |
| Employees | 2,802 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on PLD
- › Public Storage Q2 FFO Misses on Same-Store NOI Decline, Revenues Beat Zacks · 3d ago
- › W.P. Carey's Q2 AFFO Beats Estimates on Investment Activity Zacks · 4d ago
- › BXP Q2 FFO & Revenues Beat Estimates on Occupancy Gains, '26 View Up Zacks · 4d ago
- › American Tower Q2 AFFO Meets Estimates, Revenues Beat, '26 View Up Zacks · 5d ago
- › Prologis Moves to Acquire Segro in $18.7B Mega Merger CRE Daily · 6d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in PLD's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
PLD trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 16% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 38%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (20 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $151. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows good risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | PIANI OLIVIER | Director | 1,984 | $280,873 | |
| 2026-04-28 | KENNARD LYDIA H | Director | 1,984 | · | |
| 2026-04-28 | CONNOR JAMES B | Director | 1,984 | · | |
| 2026-04-28 | MODJTABAI AVID | Director | 1,984 | · | |
| 2026-04-28 | LYONS IRVING F III | Director | 43,825 | $6,202,552 | |
| 2026-04-28 | PIANI OLIVIER | Director | 1,984 | · | |
| 2026-03-31 | LETTER DANIEL | Chief Executive Officer | 16,000 | $160 | |
| 2026-03-26 | MOGHADAM HAMID R | Director | 1,019,089 | · | |
| 2026-03-09 | ANDRUS CARTER | Chief Operating Officer | 25,106 | $251 | |
| 2026-01-28 | SLUSSER SARAH ANN | Director | 111 | $12,631 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $144.07 | +1.5% | · | $1,015 | +1.5% |
| 2 months | $137.19 | +6.6% | · | $1,066 | +6.6% |
| 3 months | $130.85 | +11.8% | $1.07 | $1,126 | +12.6% |
| 6 months | $128.52 | +13.8% | $2.08 | $1,154 | +15.4% |
| 1 year | $105.81 | +38.2% | $4.10 | $1,421 | +42.1% |
| 2 years | $103.89 | +40.8% | $7.99 | $1,484 | +48.4% |
| 3 years | $110.25 | +32.6% | $11.56 | $1,431 | +43.1% |
| 5 years | $108.21 | +35.1% | $17.48 | $1,513 | +51.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.