The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 9.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 22% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 35%. The street (6 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $984.
Emcor EME
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · EMCOR Group, Inc.
read at $742.75
Emcor holds its Distribution at $742.75.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 121 days |
| Price | $742.75 |
| Valuation | 24.93 trailing · 22.56 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.13 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 10% discount to our $816.76 fair value, narrow competitive moat, 19.70% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 19.70% |
| Profit margin | 7.54% |
| Debt to equity | 13.36 |
| Analyst consensus | Buy · 7 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its accounts receivable. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is just 5.0% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money. Pass
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 57.6% of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity Only 0.1% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Builder trips on our ethics test
Picture the miles of cabling and pipework inside every new hospital or data centre. Emcor handles the heavy lifting on those jobs across the US and UK. The business still posts 20% revenue growth, 8% margins and 39% ROE, yet we pass.
Valuation at 22.7 times forward earnings leaves little room for error even with a narrow moat and a 10% margin of safety to our $816 fair value. The ethical screen is the real blocker, failing on accounts receivable practices that we will not overlook.
Consensus targets sit higher at $975, but the ethical red flag and stretched multiple keep us away regardless of the construction cycle. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 22.6x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 24.9x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 19.7% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 7.5% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 39.2% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 0.13 minimal debt — a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.26 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.13 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $33.1B |
| Employees | 44,000 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on EME
- › Implied Volatility Surging for EMCOR Stock Options Zacks · 16d ago
- › EMCOR (EME) Stock Could Be 43% Undervalued Following Raised 2026 Guidance Simply Wall St. · 16d ago
- › Quanta vs. EMCOR: Which Infrastructure Stock Is the Better Buy? Zacks · 16d ago
- › EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) Is a Trending Stock: Facts to Know Before Betting on It Zacks · 16d ago
- › 1 Large-Cap Stock on Our Buy List and 2 We Turn Down StockStory · 16d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in EME's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
EME trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 22% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading oversold. Over the past year the shares are up 68%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 35%. The street (6 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $984.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | REID WILLIAM P | Director | 2,000 | $1,851,560 | |
| 2026-05-01 | ALTMEYER JOHN W | Director | 2,500 | $2,237,500 | |
| 2026-04-30 | REID WILLIAM P | Director | 1 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | ALTMEYER JOHN W | Director | 2 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | MAURICIO MAXINE LUM | General Counsel | 4 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | NALBANDIAN JASON R. | Chief Financial Officer | 4 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | GUZZI ANTHONY J | Chief Executive Officer | 13 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | GUZZI ANTHONY J | Chief Executive Officer | 3,000 | · | |
| 2026-04-30 | SCHWARZWAELDER STEVEN | Director | 5,602 | $5,014,854 | |
| 2026-04-30 | NALBANDIAN JASON R. | Chief Financial Officer | 800 | $685,144 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | John Boozman | Republican | sell | 1K–15K |
| 27 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-24 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $931.50 | -16.1% | · | $839 | -16.1% |
| 2 months | $802.03 | -2.5% | $0.40 | $975 | -2.5% |
| 3 months | $710.18 | +10.1% | $0.40 | $1,101 | +10.1% |
| 6 months | $638.88 | +22.4% | $0.80 | $1,225 | +22.5% |
| 1 year | $465.04 | +68.1% | $1.30 | $1,684 | +68.4% |
| 2 years | $377.41 | +107.1% | $2.30 | $2,077 | +107.7% |
| 3 years | $173.26 | +351.2% | $3.09 | $4,529 | +352.9% |
| 5 years | $124.63 | +527.2% | $4.22 | $6,306 | +530.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.