The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 2.5% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 38%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $108.
eBay Inc. EBAY
Clears the common standard
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · eBay Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates marketplace platforms that connect buyers and sellers in the United States, the United Kingdom, China, Germany, and internationally.
read at $113.21
eBay Inc. holds its Markup at $113.21.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 1 days |
| Price | $113.21 |
| Valuation | 26.15 trailing · 16.80 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.37 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 16% discount to our $131.12 fair value, moderate competitive moat, 19.50% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our model sees value the Street hasn't fully caught up to yet.
| Revenue growth | 19.50% |
| Profit margin | 17.62% |
| Debt to equity | 163.33 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 27 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✓ PASSES
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 40.8% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 14.5%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 15.7% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 17.1% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 2.4% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Flea Market Icon Stumbles on Heavy Debt
Picture the old online marketplace still shifting goods from living rooms to buyers worldwide. Revenue is rising 20 percent, margins sit at 18 percent and return on equity reaches 43 percent, yet the numbers do not change the verdict.
We pass because the ethical screen flags the debt ratio. A moderate moat and a 16.6 times forward multiple look reasonable on paper, but the leverage breach rules the name out regardless of the 16 percent margin of safety to our fair value.
The risk is straightforward. High debt leaves less room if retail spending slows or competition intensifies, and the hold rating from 27 analysts at a 113 dollar median target already prices in limited upside. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 16.8x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 26.1x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 19.5% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 17.6% healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 42.9% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.63 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.22 adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.37 moves a little more than the market |
| Market cap | $50.3B |
| Employees | 12,300 |
The risks · The things to watch: it already moves more than the market on an average day; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Latest news · what the market is reading on EBAY
- › Etsy (ETSY) Gets UK Clearance To Sell Depop To eBay Simply Wall St. · 15d ago
- › Etsy vs. Wayfair: Which Consumer Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026? Motley Fool · 15d ago
- › GameStop owns nearly 10% of eBay, SEC filing shows Reuters · 15d ago
- › Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel honoured with Axel Springer Award The Telegraph · 15d ago
- › GameStop (GME) Following Uber Eats Deal Has The Bull Case Already Priced In Simply Wall St. · 16d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference — not our reporting, not advice.
Related securities · others in EBAY's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
EBAY trades on a US exchange. As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading overbought. Over the past year the shares are up 38%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 32%. The street (27 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $108.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The insider ledger · Form 4 filings, as filed
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | SWEETNAM JORDAN DOUGLAS BRADLEY | Officer | 1,010 | $116,766 | |
| 2026-05-15 | SWEETNAM JORDAN DOUGLAS BRADLEY | Officer | 4,322 | · | |
| 2026-05-15 | WELLINGTON SAMANTHA | Officer | 1,835 | · | |
| 2026-05-04 | IANNONE JAMES JOSEPH | Chief Executive Officer | 40,641 | $4,320,050 | |
| 2026-05-01 | SWEETNAM JORDAN DOUGLAS BRADLEY | Officer | 33,441 | $3,452,772 | |
| 2026-05-01 | SWEETNAM JORDAN DOUGLAS BRADLEY | Officer | 33,441 | $1,929,880 | |
| 2026-05-01 | ROWE ZANE C | Director | 260 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | GREEN LOGAN D | Director | 229 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | CHENNAPRAGADA APARNA | Director | 217 | · | |
| 2026-05-01 | TRAQUINA PERRY M | Director | 296 | · |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 May2026 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-04-13 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | Purchase | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $107.83 | -0.2% | $0.31 | $1,001 | +0.1% |
| 2 months | $95.14 | +13.1% | $0.31 | $1,134 | +13.4% |
| 3 months | $89.75 | +19.9% | $0.31 | $1,202 | +20.2% |
| 6 months | $83.89 | +28.3% | $0.62 | $1,290 | +29.0% |
| 1 year | $77.77 | +38.4% | $1.20 | $1,399 | +39.9% |
| 2 years | $51.57 | +108.6% | $2.32 | $2,131 | +113.1% |
| 3 years | $43.48 | +147.5% | $3.36 | $2,552 | +155.2% |
| 5 years | $61.52 | +74.9% | $5.10 | $1,832 | +83.2% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.