The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 4.2% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 26%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $23.
Antero Midstream Corp AM
Clears the common standard
An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · Antero Midstream Corporation owns, operates, and develops midstream energy assets in the Appalachian Basin.
read at $21.55
Antero Midstream Corp holds its Distribution at $21.55.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Distribution label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · passes the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Distribution · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the buyers, held for 497 days |
| Price | $21.55 |
| Valuation | 25.96 trailing · 13.37 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.61 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish — a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
| Revenue growth | 8.60% |
| Profit margin | 31.94% |
| Debt to equity | 191.72 |
| Analyst consensus | Hold · 7 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
It depends which standard you follow. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor, and on this company they disagree. Here is how it did on each:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✓ PASSES
Why the two disagree. They fall out over one thing only: the company’s debt. Our stricter standard measures that debt against what the company owns, and it works out too high to pass. The common standard measures the same debt against what the company is worth on the stock market, where it works out low enough to pass. Every other check, the two agree on. So in practice, most halal apps would treat this as fine to hold, while our stricter view would not — and which line you follow is between you and your scholar.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Against market value it is 34.6%, under the 30% line the market-value standard uses — so that standard clears it. Divergent
- Interest-bearing cash Interest-bearing cash and securities are of assets, above the one-third limit. Fail
- Receivables Money owed to the company is of assets, above the 49% limit. Fail
- Revenue purity of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, over the 5% line. Fail
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Toll roads for Appalachian gas look pricey
Picture the pipelines that carry gas from the wellhead to the market. Antero Midstream runs that network in the Appalachian Basin, collecting steady fees on every cubic foot that moves. Revenue is growing 9 percent, margins sit at 32 percent and return on equity reaches 20 percent, yet the shares trade at 22.59 dollars against our fair value of 18.26 dollars.
The numbers do not scream value. A forward multiple of 15.3 times on a narrow-moat cyclical business leaves little margin for error, and the market already prices in the hold consensus from seven analysts. We pass.
Energy volumes and prices swing hard. When drillers slow down, the fees drop and the low multiple proves to be a warning rather than a bargain. Ethical screen cleared, yet the price still sits too high.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.4x priced for continued growth |
| Trailing P/E | 26.0x a premium valuation |
| Revenue growth | 8.6% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 31.9% highly profitable on every dollar of sales |
| Return on equity | 20.4% an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.92 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 0.99 below 1 — short-term bills exceed liquid assets |
| Beta | 0.61 steadier than the market |
| Market cap | $10.2B |
| Employees | 632 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Related securities · others in AM's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 26%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $23.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it A, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 11% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 26%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (7 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $23.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows excellent risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 May2026 | Rick Allen | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 7 Feb2025 | Tim Walberg | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 7 Feb2025 | Tim Walberg | Republican | buy | 15K–50K |
| 5 May2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 5 May2026 | Josh Gottheimer | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $21.31 | +1.8% | · | $1,018 | +1.8% |
| 2 months | $21.80 | -0.5% | $0.23 | $1,005 | +0.5% |
| 3 months | $22.61 | -4.1% | $0.23 | $969 | -3.1% |
| 6 months | $17.66 | +22.9% | $0.45 | $1,254 | +25.4% |
| 1 year | $17.28 | +25.6% | $0.90 | $1,308 | +30.8% |
| 2 years | $13.17 | +64.7% | $1.80 | $1,784 | +78.4% |
| 3 years | $9.09 | +138.6% | $2.70 | $2,683 | +168.3% |
| 5 years | $7.40 | +193.1% | $4.50 | $3,539 | +253.9% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.