The framework has shifted from markdown to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 0.7% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41.
STAG Industrial, Inc.
STAG · the NYSE · USD · Market cap $7.4B · 93 employees
STAG Industrial, Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenPrice as of 6 Nov 2026Daily close, not a live quote
Screened 2026-11-06 · the tape above runs as of 04:01 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
Key facts today
- Price36.60 USD at the 6 Nov 2026 close
- Our value readOvervalued vs our fair value, as of 6 Nov 2026
- Our regime readAccumulation, as of 7 Nov 2026
- Ethical screenDoes not pass
- OptionsOpen interest leans slightly to calls (put/call 0.83)
- Last reviewed6 Nov 2026 (2 days ago)
- Release timesRelease and earnings times on your chart: Event Guard Mentor
A summary of the dated readings below, not a live quote and not advice.
Our fair-value range: $27.42 to $31.53, base estimate $27.42 (screen dated 2026-11-06).
- Trend Accumulation
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning political buying, disclosed 2026-09-17
- Options put/call open interest 0.83, read 2026-11-07
- Ethical does not pass the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its accumulation label.
STAG Industrial, Inc. holds its Accumulation at $36.60. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 342 days.
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 342 days |
| Price at the screen | $36.60 |
| Valuation | 26.84 trailing · 43.01 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | 0.92 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 45.66% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 45.7% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 2.38% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 2.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.05% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
The Ethical ReadWhy It Falls Short, in Plain English
STAG Industrial,'s business is in a permissible area, but its interest-bearing debt is about 46% of the company, well over the ~33% line, so it does not pass on the financial screens.
Read as at 2026-11-07. It updates when the underlying figures move, and past reads are kept below.
Follow this verdict
Get an email when STAG's ethical verdict changes
Today STAG does not pass the screen. If new figures move it to a pass, we send you one short email with the before and after. Verdicts change rarely, so you may not hear from us for a long time.
Free, no account needed. Every email has a link to stop.
The Fair Value Range
Our analysis reads Overvalued vs our fair value, as of 6 Nov 2026: it trades above our $27.42 fair value estimate, 9.40% revenue growth.
How a fair value is estimated: discounted cash flow (DCF).
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-11-06 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 33.5% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 12 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +15% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere our models see it going: fair-value estimate $27.42, with a range of $27.42 to $31.53, dated to the 2026-11-06 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsWarehouses Fetch Premium While Fair Value Lags
Picture a landlord collecting steady rents from distribution centres across forty one states yet asking investors to pay forty two dollars for every dollar of earnings. STAG shows solid nine percent revenue growth and a twenty eight percent profit margin, yet its price sits more than fifty percent above our fair value estimate with a forward multiple of forty seven times. The ethical screen clears but the numbers do not, so we pass.
High valuations like this often mask thin returns on equity, here just seven percent, and leave little room if interest rates stay elevated or leasing demand softens. Analyst targets cluster near the current price, yet that consensus rarely accounts for mean reversion in property yields. The gap between quoted value and intrinsic worth is the core issue.
Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 43.0xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 26.8xa premium valuation |
| EPS, trailing | 1.41 |
| EPS, forward | 0.88 |
| Revenue growth | +9.4%steady growth |
| Profit margin | 29.9%healthy profit margins |
| Return on equity | 7.6%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 6.29% |
| Dividend yield | 4.08% |
| Debt to equity | 0.93moderate, manageable leverage |
| Current ratio | 1.46adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.92steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.06% |
| 52-week range | 35.14 - 42.61 |
| Market cap | $7.4B |
| Employees | 93 |
Another profit measure, before interest, tax and non-cash costs: EBITDA.
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeSTAG trades on the NYSE. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 2.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 0.4% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is momentum reading bearish. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The analysis reads markdown. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved up 0.8% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it D, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 6%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 12%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $41.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- Roth IRA vs. Taxable Account: The Tax Difference on $25,500 in Annual Dividends Yahoo Finance · 10d ago
- Stag Industrial Q3 Earnings Call Highlights Yahoo Finance · 10d ago
- Stag: Q3 Earnings Snapshot Yahoo Finance · 10d ago
- STAG (STAG) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript Yahoo Finance · 10d ago
- STAG Industrial, Inc. Q3 2026 Earnings Call Summary Yahoo Finance · 11d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-17 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-17 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-09-17 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $38.56 | -1.5% | · | $986 | -1.5% |
| 2 months | $38.15 | -0.4% | · | $996 | -0.4% |
| 3 months | $37.63 | +1.0% | $0.39 | $1,020 | +2.0% |
| 6 months | $37.62 | +1.0% | $0.51 | $1,024 | +2.4% |
| 1 year | $35.77 | +6.2% | $1.26 | $1,098 | +9.8% |
| 2 years | $32.43 | +17.2% | $2.74 | $1,256 | +25.6% |
| 3 years | $32.10 | +18.4% | $4.21 | $1,315 | +31.5% |
| 5 years | $31.72 | +19.8% | $7.14 | $1,423 | +42.3% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever STAG does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.