The framework has shifted from markup to markdown since the last review. Price is trending lower. Sellers are in control and the prior trend has reversed. Price has moved down 10.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $71.
A. O. Smith
AOS · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $7.7B · 11,500 employees
A.
PASS · Titan Ethical · score 91.4Screen close, 2026-09-18 · not a live quote
Last reviewed 4 days ago
Screened 2026-09-18 · the tape above runs as of 09:00 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
What this means: price 56.95 against the desk's fair-value range, base estimate 71.33, over the last year.
- Trend Markdown
- Insiders no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- Positioning no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- Options no verdict drawn today, left as found
- Ethical passes the values gate
Our analytic regime reads on this name, dated and marked against the screened price. Small sample per name, and separate from the daily-framework accuracy on the Track Record page.
This name holds its markdown label.
A. O. Smith holds its Markdown at $56.95. The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 7 days.
| Phase | Markdown · caution |
| Quantitative state | The statistical read favours the sellers, held for 7 days |
| Price at the screen | $56.95 |
| Valuation | 15.80 trailing · 13.86 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | PASS · score 91.4 |
| Beta | 1.15 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Full pass across all five screens. This security clears the Titan Ethical Standard: its business and its balance sheet both stay inside the lines.
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 6.11% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is just 6.1% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling: it does not run on borrowed money. | Pass |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.60% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.6% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 24.08% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 24.1% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads OPPORTUNITY: it trades at roughly a 25% discount to our $71.33 fair value, moderate competitive moat.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-18 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 25.2% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 11 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits +23% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-18 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsEveryday Water Heaters Hide Strong Cash Returns
Think of the boiler in a suburban home or the tank in a hotel basement. A. O. Smith makes those essential pieces and still clears a 14 percent profit margin with 28 percent return on equity. The shares sit at 58.85 dollars against a 67.66 dollar fair value, a 15 percent margin of safety, and a forward multiple of just 14.1 times. Moderate moat, clean ethical screen and double-digit margins in a basic industrial niche make the case stand out.
Revenue slipped 2 percent lately, yet the business keeps throwing off cash while analysts sit on a hold rating with a 70 dollar median target. That combination of solid returns and a depressed multiple is what draws attention here.
Housing cycles and any fresh slowdown in China or North America could pressure volumes further. The numbers still show value rather than a bargain trap. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 13.9xreasonably valued |
| Trailing P/E | 15.8xreasonably valued |
| EPS, trailing | 3.59 |
| EPS, forward | 4.09 |
| Revenue growth | -0.7%revenue is shrinking |
| Profit margin | 13.1%thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 27.1%an exceptional return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 6.29% |
| Dividend yield | 2.45% |
| Debt to equity | 0.37minimal debt: a conservative balance sheet |
| Current ratio | 1.59healthy short-term liquidity |
| Beta | 1.15moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.11% |
| 52-week range | 54.16 - 81.87 |
| Moat | MODERATE |
| Market cap | $7.7B |
| Employees | 11,500 |
The risks · The main risks here are ordinary market swings and the chance our fair-value read proves too optimistic.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeAOS trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 7.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $71.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved up 2.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $71.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $71.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score (91). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 11%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 9%. The street (11 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $71.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score (91). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with near-perfect ethical score (91). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- 1 Safe-and-Steady Stock to Own for Decades and 2 Facing Challenges StockStory · 4d ago
- A. O. Smith (AOS) Is Getting Fresh Attention, What Is Behind It? Simply Wall St. · 6d ago
- Are New Smart Heater Forecasts Reframing A. O. Smith's (AOS) Competitive Edge In Connected Homes? Simply Wall St. · 6d ago
- Q2 Earnings Highlights: A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) Vs The Rest Of The HVAC and Water Systems Stocks StockStory · 11d ago
- 3 Cash-Producing Stocks with Warning Signs StockStory · 13d ago
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-13 | SMITH MARK D | Director | 2,262 | $150,016 | |
| 2026-04-13 | MAPES CHRISTOPHER L | Director | 2,262 | $150,016 | |
| 2026-04-13 | KADRI ILHAM | Director | 2,262 | $150,016 | |
| 2026-04-13 | FISTER TODD W | Director | 2,262 | $150,016 | |
| 2026-04-13 | MARTIN LOIS M | Director | 2,262 | $150,016 | |
| 2026-03-04 | SCHUH DARRELL W | Officer | 1,104 | $82,126 | |
| 2026-02-23 | CARVER SAMUEL M | Officer | 1,144 | · | |
| 2026-02-13 | SCHUH DARRELL W | Officer | 356 | $28,439 | |
| 2026-02-13 | STERN JAMES F | Officer | 1,633 | $130,452 | |
| 2026-02-13 | WHEELER KEVIN J. | Officer and Director | 8,598 | $686,851 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-23 | Julie Johnson | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2025-09-23 | Julie Johnson | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2025-09-23 | Julie Johnson | Democrat | sell | 1K–15K |
| 2025-09-23 | Julie Johnson | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $58.52 | -1.7% | · | $983 | -1.7% |
| 2 months | $65.55 | -12.3% | $0.36 | $883 | -11.7% |
| 3 months | $66.19 | -13.1% | $0.36 | $874 | -12.6% |
| 6 months | $67.86 | -15.2% | $0.72 | $858 | -14.2% |
| 1 year | $64.39 | -10.7% | $1.42 | $915 | -8.5% |
| 2 years | $78.35 | -26.6% | $2.76 | $769 | -23.1% |
| 3 years | $65.06 | -11.6% | $4.02 | $946 | -5.4% |
| 5 years | $62.88 | -8.5% | $6.30 | $1,015 | +1.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever AOS does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.