The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (13 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $173.
NTT (Nippon Telegraph) 9432.T
Outside both standardsAn entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · NTT, Inc.
read at $148.00
NTT (Nippon Telegraph) holds its Markup at $148.00.
- PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
- INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
- POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
- OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
- SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
- edge confirmed
- edge broken
- edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
The investor read · the season, not the day
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 3 days |
| Price | $148.00 |
| Valuation | 11.74 trailing · 10.17 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 70.0 |
| Beta | -0.18 |
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Our framework reads AVOID — it trades at roughly a 45% discount to our $215.00 fair value, 9.10% revenue growth.
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
| Revenue growth | 9.10% |
| Profit margin | 7.20% |
| Debt to equity | 165.59 |
| Analyst consensus | None · 13 covering |
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
Used by most halal investing apps ✗ DOES NOT PASS
The one Titan applies ✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its debt ratio 37.2%. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
What these two standards are, and how they differ →
- Business activity Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. Pass
- Debt load Interest-bearing debt is 37.2% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. Fail
- Interest-bearing cash Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 3.3% of assets, under the one-third limit. Pass
- Receivables Money owed to the company is 16.2% of assets, under the 49% limit. Pass
- Revenue purity Only 0.8% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line. Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
Why it gives us pause
At 10.2x forward earnings, the price already runs ahead of the business. Our fair value sits at $215.00, below where it trades today.
| Forward P/E | 10.2x fairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 11.7x reasonably valued |
| Revenue growth | 9.1% steady growth |
| Profit margin | 7.2% thin but positive margins |
| Return on equity | 10.0% a modest return on shareholder capital |
| Debt to equity | 1.66 a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Beta | -0.18 barely tracks the market's swings |
| Market cap | $12.05T |
The risks · The things to watch: its business and earnings are exposed to Japan and to currency swings; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & how to trade · wherever in the world you are
9432.T trades on TSE (the company is based in Japan). As a US-listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering US markets. New to this, or investing from outside the US? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is holding around 2% above its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 2%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 5%. The street (13 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $173.
5 July 2026 — ¥148 — DISTRIBUTION (state model: sideways, 3 days, low conviction). Journal opened on the deepest value gap on record here: price ¥148, our fair value ¥337, three-year return minus 0.75%, daily movement 0.9%. Tensions on file: cheap-for-years as its own verdict, a leverage-rule screen fail at 37.2% debt, empty insider file, no catalyst. The lines: ¥144.3 and ¥167.2. Next review: either line breaking or the earnings path waking, whichever is first.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $148.40 | +0.4% | · | $1,004 | +0.4% |
| 2 months | $153.10 | -2.7% | · | $973 | -2.7% |
| 3 months | $153.10 | -2.7% | $2.65 | $991 | -0.9% |
| 6 months | $152.91 | -2.6% | $2.65 | $992 | -0.8% |
| 1 year | $151.91 | -1.9% | $5.30 | $1,016 | +1.6% |
| 2 years | $141.20 | +5.5% | $10.50 | $1,130 | +13.0% |
| 3 years | $150.13 | -0.8% | $15.60 | $1,096 | +9.6% |
| 5 years | $99.23 | +50.2% | $25.00 | $1,754 | +75.4% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.