An entry written while the outcome is still unknown. It will be scored by what the market does next, and it will never be edited to look cleverer than it was.
In plain words · CS Disco, Inc.
VERDICT
The label
Markup
read at $4.05
CS Disco Inc holds its Markup at $4.05.
PHPhase · the trend structure carries the Markup label
INInsiders · no filings inside 60 days, left as found
POPositioning · no disclosures inside 60 days, left as found
OPOptions · no verdict drawn today, left as found
SCScreen · does not pass the values gate
edge confirmed
edge broken
edge forming
Each arm is one independent read. Conviction is not a single call, it is how many edges converge.
INVESTOR
The investor read · the season, not the day
As held on the ledger · 2025-12-31
Phase
Markup
Quantitative state
Elevated stress, defensive posture warranted, held for 2 days
Price
$4.05
Valuation
N/A trailing · -151.86 forward price to earnings
Values screen
FAIL· score 70.0
Beta
1.91
OPPORTUNITY
The opportunity · what the numbers say it is worth
Read at
$4.05
N/A P/E · -151.86 fwd
Our fair value
$6.00
48% discount
Analyst target (avg)
$6.00
+48% to current
Target low $4.00Analyst target rangeTarget high $10.00
▲ current $4.05 · | average target
Price history & projections · where it has been, where the models see it going
The valuation journey · where the price sits against fair value and the Street
Current
$4.05
you are here
Conservative
$4.00
-1%
Analyst avg
$6.00
+48%
Our fair value
$6.00
+48%
Analyst high
$10.00
+147%
Green marks levels above today's price, red below; the shaded band is the gap between the price and our fair value.
Reading the gap · Both our model and the analysts see meaningful upside from here.
Revenue growth
14.30%
Profit margin
-26.28%
Debt to equity
5.10
Analyst consensus
None · 3 covering
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; target range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
SCREEN
The values screen, explained · five checks, plain English
This company is excluded by both standards. There are two widely recognised ways to check whether a company is suitable for a Muslim investor. It fails on both:
The common standard· AAOIFI Used by most halal investing apps✗ DOES NOT PASS
Our stricter standard· asset-based The one Titan applies✗ DOES NOT PASS
Why it fails. The problem is its interest-bearing securities. Because both standards agree on this, it is a clear exclusion, not a borderline case.
Business activityIts core business isn't built on prohibited lines — no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending.Pass
Debt loadInterest-bearing debt is just 4.0% of its assets, well under the one-third ceiling — it does not run on borrowed money.Pass
Interest-bearing cashInterest-bearing cash and securities are 54.7% of assets, above the one-third limit.Fail
ReceivablesMoney owed to the company is 26.1% of assets, under the 49% limit.Pass
Revenue purityOnly 2.9% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources — under the 5% line.Pass
Every security is read against two recognised standards: our stricter asset-based screen (ratios measured against total assets) and the more widely used market-value standard (measured against market capitalisation). Where they agree we say so plainly; where they part ways — almost always on the debt check — we show both readings and mark it, because that disagreement is the finding, not a fault. We report the score; you and your scholar make the call.
PLAIN
The business, in plain words · what the numbers mean
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; it already moves more than the market on an average day.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
PEERS
Related securities · others in LAW's space worth a look
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
TRADER
The trader read · the latest dated commentary
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 13.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 16%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (3 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $7. Entered 2026-08-04 · Markup
JOURNAL
The dated journal · newest first, never edited
2026-08-04Markup · changed$4.05+13.1%Entry 4
The framework has shifted from distribution to markup since the last review. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved up 13.1% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows modest positive risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 16%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (3 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $7.
2026-07-18Distribution$3.58+0.0%Entry 3
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 16%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 25%. The street (3 analysts) rates it none, with a mean price target of $7.
2026-07-03Distribution$3.58+0.0%Entry 2
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
2026-07-02Distribution$3.58Entry 1
The framework reads distribution. Smart money appears to be selling into strength. Institutional holders may be rotating out. Ethical screening: PASS with passing ethical screen (70). The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
POLITICAL
The political ledger · congressional disclosures
Disclosures naming LAW
Date
Politician
Party
Type
Amount
7 May2026
Ro Khanna
Democrat
sell
1K–15K
RETURNS
What holding actually paid · price plus dividends
If $1,000 had been placed · historical, not a promise
Period
Price then
Price return
Divs per share
$1,000 became
Total return
1 month
$3.74
-1.6%
·
$984
-1.6%
2 months
$3.35
+9.9%
·
$1,099
+9.9%
3 months
$4.44
-17.1%
·
$829
-17.1%
6 months
$8.91
-58.7%
·
$413
-58.7%
1 year
$4.39
-16.2%
·
$838
-16.2%
2 years
$5.93
-37.9%
·
$621
-37.9%
3 years
$8.03
-54.2%
·
$458
-54.2%
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
SEALED
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever LAW does next, these words stay.
CS Disco Inc · LAW · Markup · $4.05
Recorded 2025-12-31 · before the outcome · scored mechanically