The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 34%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (13 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $8.
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.
GO · Nasdaq · USD · Market cap $766M · 1,642 employees
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-05-13
Screened 2026-05-13 · the tape above runs as of 07:00 UTC · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its accumulation label.
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. holds its Accumulation at $8.56. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 34 days.
| Phase | Accumulation |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 34 days |
| Price at the screen | $8.56 |
| Valuation | 0.00 trailing · 12.65 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 0.66 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 236.36% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 236.4% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 9.09% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 9.1% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 0.00% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 0.0% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.00% | Below 5% | Only 0.0% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades at roughly a 5% discount to our $8.97 fair value, weak competitive moat, 10.70% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-05-13 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. A 4.8% margin of safety to the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 13 covering, consensus Hold. The average target sits −1% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our model sees value the Street hasn't fully caught up to yet.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-05-13 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsWhy it gives us pause
At 12.7x forward earnings, the price already runs ahead of the business. Our fair value sits at $8.97, below where it trades today. The weak moat is real, but quality alone does not make an expensive price cheap.
| Forward P/E | 12.7xfairly priced for its growth rate |
| Trailing P/E | 0.0x |
| EPS, trailing | -2.30 |
| EPS, forward | 0.61 |
| Revenue growth | +10.7%steady growth |
| Profit margin | -4.8%currently unprofitable |
| Return on equity | -20.6%not currently earning a positive return on equity |
| Debt to equity | 1.84a meaningful debt load worth watching |
| Current ratio | 1.28adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 0.66steadier than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.39% |
| 52-week range | 5.66 - 19.41 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $766M |
| Employees | 1,642 |
The risks · The things to watch: it's a small-cap, so the share price can swing harder than the market; it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeGO trades on Nasdaq. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 34%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (13 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $8.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are down 34%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 20%. The street (13 analysts) rates it hold, with a mean price target of $8.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-25 | Miller Paul Blaine | See Remarks | Purchase | 5,000 | $8 |
| 2026-04-01 | BORTNER ANDREA RENEE | Officer | 1,851 | $12,957 | |
| 2026-03-27 | RAGATZ ERIK D | Director | 125,000 | $882,500 | |
| 2026-03-24 | POTTER JASON JAY | Chief Executive Officer | 112,808 | $717,174 | |
| 2026-03-19 | RAGATZ ERIK D | Director | 83,997 | $486,382 | |
| 2026-03-19 | POTTER JASON JAY | Chief Executive Officer | 286,097 | $1,687,972 | |
| 2026-03-17 | RAGATZ ERIK D | Director | 116,003 | $702,618 | |
| 2026-03-16 | THOMPSON LUKE D | General Counsel | 3,425 | $20,756 | |
| 2026-03-16 | WILSON STEVEN K | Officer | 4,721 | $28,609 | |
| 2026-03-16 | BORTNER ANDREA RENEE | Officer | 3,705 | $22,452 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-27 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 2026-08-27 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 2026-08-27 | Ro Khanna | Democrat | buy | 50K–100K |
| 2026-08-26 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 2026-08-26 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $7.85 | +15.1% | · | $1,151 | +15.1% |
| 2 months | $6.84 | +32.1% | · | $1,321 | +32.1% |
| 3 months | $6.08 | +48.6% | · | $1,486 | +48.6% |
| 6 months | $11.15 | -19.0% | · | $810 | -19.0% |
| 1 year | $13.63 | -33.7% | · | $663 | -33.7% |
| 2 years | $21.14 | -57.3% | · | $427 | -57.3% |
| 3 years | $27.94 | -67.7% | · | $323 | -67.7% |
| 5 years | $34.11 | -73.5% | · | $265 | -73.5% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever GO does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.