The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $95. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
Estée Lauder Companies (The)
EL · a US exchange · USD · Market cap $35.7B · 40,470 employees
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
FAIL · Does not pass the screenAt the last full screen
2026-09-09
Screened 2026-09-09 · the tape above runs as of 22:12 UTC · 11 Sep · two dates, stated on purpose · verdict and workings shown in full · never trimmed
This name holds its markup label.
Estée Lauder Companies (The) holds its Markup at $98.77. Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 7 days.
| Phase | Markup |
| Quantitative state | Consolidating, no directional conviction, held for 7 days |
| Price at the screen | $98.77 |
| Valuation | 197.54 trailing · 25.24 forward price to earnings |
| Values screen | FAIL · score 10.0 |
| Beta | 1.27 |
Five Screens, Shown in Full
Does not pass. Debt ratio
| Test | Figure | Limit | What it means | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business activity | Permissible | Core business clean | Its core business isn't built on prohibited lines: no gambling, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, or interest-based lending. | Pass |
| Debt load | 47.59% | Below 33% | Interest-bearing debt is 47.6% of its assets, above the one-third ceiling the screen allows. | Fail |
| Interest-bearing cash | 0.00% | Below 33% | Cash held in interest-bearing accounts and securities is 0.0% of assets, under the one-third limit. | Pass |
| Receivables | 22.38% | Below 49% | Money owed to the company is 22.4% of assets, under the 49% limit. | Pass |
| Revenue purity | 0.80% | Below 5% | Only 0.8% of revenue comes from non-compliant sources, under the 5% line. | Pass |
Five checks adapted from AAOIFI screening standards: business activity plus four balance-sheet ratios. All five must pass for ethical clearance. Every figure is arithmetic on public accounts, not judgement.
What the Numbers Say It Is WorthThe Fair Value Range
Our framework reads AVOID: it trades above our $92.14 fair value estimate, weak competitive moat, 6.30% revenue growth.
Fair value range in USD, drawn from the 2026-09-09 screen. The gold marker is the market price at the same screen. The price runs 6.7% above the base estimate.
Third-party analyst targets: 27 covering, consensus Buy. The average target sits +7% from the screen price.
Reading the gap · Our more conservative model reads it as fully-to-richly valued here, while the Street is more bullish: a quality-at-a-fair-price name rather than a deep-value one.
Price History & ProjectionsWhere it has been, where the models see it going. History from market close data; projection points are our fair-value estimates and third-party analyst targets, dated to the 2026-09-09 screen.
Fair value and rating are our own model estimates; the Street's range reflects third-party analyst estimates. Analysis, not advice.
The Business, in Plain WordsLuxury creams lose their shine on weak numbers
Walk down any high street and Estée Lauder products still sit on the shelves, yet the company is posting a negative profit margin and a negative return on equity. We pass because the shares trade at 25.8 times forward earnings while our fair value sits well below the current price and the business carries too much debt.
Revenue growth has slowed to just 5 percent and the moat looks weak, leaving little room for error if consumers trade down. The ethical screen flags the debt ratio as a clear fail, and that alone rules it out regardless of what the sell side says.
Analysts may still favour the name with a median target near 90 dollars, but peak margins and stretched valuations have trapped investors in similar consumer names before. Analysis, not advice.
| Forward P/E | 25.2xexpensive even after accounting for its growth |
| Trailing P/E | 197.5xexpensive: the price assumes strong growth ahead |
| EPS, trailing | 0.50 |
| EPS, forward | 3.91 |
| Revenue growth | +6.3%slow but positive growth |
| Profit margin | 1.2%barely profitable |
| Return on equity | 4.7%a modest return on shareholder capital |
| FCF yield | 5.07% |
| Dividend yield | 162.00% |
| Debt to equity | 2.43heavy leverage: higher risk if revenue softens |
| Current ratio | 1.22adequate liquidity, worth monitoring |
| Beta | 1.27moves a little more than the market |
| Short interest, float | 0.03% |
| 52-week range | 66.22 - 121.64 |
| Moat | WEAK |
| Market cap | $35.7B |
| Employees | 40,470 |
The risks · The things to watch: it carries a real debt load, which raises the stakes if revenue slips.
Plain-English interpretation of our own screen data. Analysis, not advice.
Where & How to TradeEL trades on a US exchange. As a listed security it is accessible through almost any international broker offering its home market. New to this, or investing from abroad? Our guide to accessing global markets covers brokers, currencies and the practical steps.
Every Entry, As Written
The framework reads accumulation. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $95. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework has shifted from markup to accumulation since the last review. Smart money appears to be quietly building positions. This typically precedes a markup phase. Price has moved up 5.9% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it B, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $95. It reported earnings in this window, a natural checkpoint for the thesis.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 1.6% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $95.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns. Our composite framework grades it C, carrying a low risk profile. Technically it is sitting below its long-term trend line with momentum reading neutral. Over the past year the shares are up 23%. Our forward projection puts the odds of a 10% gain over the next month near 22%. The street (23 analysts) rates it buy, with a mean price target of $95.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Price has moved down 0.0% since our last review. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
The framework reads markup. Price is trending higher with momentum. The crowd has caught on and buyers are in control. Ethical screening: FAIL. This security does not pass our values-based screening criteria. The risk-adjusted return profile shows negative risk-adjusted returns.
Each entry above was written on its date, before the outcome. A journal you can prune is not a journal.
- 3 Profitable Stocks We Think Twice About StockStory · 17 Jul 2026
- 2 Stocks Down 44% and 30% to Buy Right Now and Hold for the Next Decade Motley Fool · 17 Jul 2026
- J. Crew names brand president Retail Dive · 10 Jul 2026
- Estée Lauder’s Profit Recovery Plan and Russell Inclusion Might Change The Case For Investing In EL Simply Wall St. · 9 Jul 2026
- Estée Lauder (EL) Stock May Trade At A Discount As Restructuring Builds Simply Wall St. · 9 Jul 2026
Headlines from third-party outlets, linked for reference: not our reporting, not advice.
Screened names in the same industry · explore each on its own page.
| Date | Insider | Title | Type | Shares | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-27 | DE LA FAVERIE STEPHANE | Chief Executive Officer | 5,787 | · | |
| 2026-02-27 | SHRIVASTAVA AKHIL | Chief Financial Officer | 5,265 | · | |
| 2025-11-26 | LAUDER JANE A | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 17,840 | $1,596,145 | |
| 2025-11-26 | LA LANDE RASHIDA K | General Counsel | 1,604 | $151,498 | |
| 2025-11-26 | LAUDER JANE A | Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security | 17,840 | $1,683,739 | |
| 2025-11-18 | WEBSTER MERIDITH P | Officer | 5,430 | $476,971 | |
| 2025-11-11 | STERNLICHT BARRY S | Director | 3,972 | $335,038 | |
| 2025-11-11 | STERNLICHT BARRY S | Director | 3,972 | $364,749 | |
| 2025-11-06 | LAL 2015 ELF TRUST | Trustee | 5,670,000 | $508,599,000 | |
| 2025-11-06 | EVELYN H. LAUDER 2012 MARITAL TRUST TWO | Trustee | 2,845,283 | $255,221,885 |
Public filings, recorded as found. The full tape lives at Insider Intelligence.
| Date | Politician | Party | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 May2024 | Tommy Tuberville | Republican | buy | 50K–100K |
| 9 Jun2026 | Gil Cisneros | Democrat | buy | 1K–15K |
| 9 Apr2026 | Scott Peters | Democrat | sell | 500K–1M |
| 9 Apr2025 | John Boozman | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| 9 Apr2025 | John Boozman | Republican | buy | 1K–15K |
| Period | Price then | Price return | Divs per share | $1,000 became | Total return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | $82.43 | +3.4% | $0.35 | $1,038 | +3.8% |
| 2 months | $72.39 | +17.8% | $0.35 | $1,182 | +18.2% |
| 3 months | $83.97 | +1.5% | $0.35 | $1,019 | +1.9% |
| 6 months | $104.82 | -18.7% | $0.70 | $820 | -18.0% |
| 1 year | $69.44 | +22.8% | $1.40 | $1,248 | +24.8% |
| 2 years | $114.55 | -25.6% | $3.11 | $771 | -22.9% |
| 3 years | $166.94 | -48.9% | $5.75 | $545 | -45.5% |
| 5 years | $278.47 | -69.4% | $10.66 | $344 | -65.6% |
Historical returns from market close data. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This entry now belongs to the ledger. Whatever EL does next, these words stay.
Thirteen thousand names carry this page. One desk keeps them honest.
Membership opens the full screen archive, the composites built from it, and the daily coverage that prices what the screen approves.
Join the deskScreening is research, not a fatwa and not financial advice. Figures are drawn from public accounts at the screen date shown. Always manage your risk.